The seven major UK committees jointly pressure: Push for a comprehensive ban on cryptocurrency political donations

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【Chain Wen】The controversy surrounding digital assets in the UK political circle has heated up again. Liam Byrne, Chair of the Business and Trade Select Committee, along with six other committee chairs, jointly issued a statement calling for the UK government to completely ban cryptocurrency donations to political parties.

These lawmakers pointed out the core issue: cryptocurrency donations severely undermine transparency in political funding. The reason is that the anonymous nature of digital assets may conceal the true source of funds, leading to a large influx of micro-donations below disclosure thresholds. Liam Byrne candidly expressed his concerns—if this continues, UK politics could be at high risk of foreign interference. The Electoral Commission also admitted that, with current technology, effectively managing these risks is extremely difficult.

This collective pressure has increased considerable pressure on the UK Labour government. Since mid-2025, the Labour Party has been researching a ban on cryptocurrency political donations. The real breakthrough is that Reform UK became the first political organization in the UK to accept cryptocurrency donations in mid-2025, and any ban would directly impact the party’s fundraising channels. However, it is worth noting that the £9 million large donation from well-known investor Christopher Harborne was ultimately completed in traditional fiat currency.

This game of digital assets and political financing essentially reflects the challenge that the Web3 era poses to traditional financial regulatory systems.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MerkleMaidvip
· 9h ago
Just ban it if you want, since politicians already have a bad impression of crypto... However, I remain skeptical about the actual implementation if it really gets enforced.
View OriginalReply0
GasSavingMastervip
· 11h ago
What are they banning now? Might as well just eliminate all crypto.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTradervip
· 01-13 13:28
Here we go again with bans. The UK’s approach is really outdated. Anonymous donations are inherently a double-edged sword. Speaking of which, seven committees mobilized together. It seems someone is really getting anxious. Why is this logic always the same? Foreign interference? The transparent blockchain of cryptocurrencies is instead being scapegoated. If the Labour Party really wants to ban it, what about other sources of funding? Why not regulate those? Banning it won’t help; transfers still happen secretly, just with a different wrapper. The key issue is that the regulatory approach is too rigid, wanting to cut everything with a single stroke.
View OriginalReply0
MercilessHalalvip
· 01-12 01:04
Banning is the proper action; this thing has always been shady, and politics still dare to get involved...
View OriginalReply0
AirdropF5Brovip
· 01-12 00:56
Just ban it if you want, but big players have already shifted to on-chain, haha
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTradervip
· 01-12 00:56
Ban on crypto donations? Uh... are these lawmakers trying to make politics more transparent or just panicking? --- Wait, can they really track on-chain funds? I doubt it. --- The rhetoric about foreign interference risks sounds like they want to demonize the entire Web3 space. --- The Election Commission says they can't regulate it... so can the ban really solve the problem? --- Interestingly, there's a lot of black money issues with fiat donations, but they only target crypto? --- The UK’s recent moves really show they’re starting to be afraid. --- Talking about transparency sounds nice, but in reality, they just want full control.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSherlockGirlvip
· 01-12 00:42
Ha, coming back with the ban coins routine? On-chain data has already been exposed, and politicians are probably not afraid of transparency issues at all.
View OriginalReply0
NftBankruptcyClubvip
· 01-12 00:42
My goodness, another ban on crypto donations? Honestly, they just haven't figured out how to regulate it yet. --- The excuse that anonymity masks the source of funds is getting old... Traditional political donations are transparent, right? --- UK politicians are getting anxious, afraid that retail investors will bypass their control through on-chain donations. --- The ban is here, but they can never fully prohibit the decentralized nature of crypto—it's just a matter of who’s smarter. --- The Labour Party is still researching in 2025? Well, it looks like there won't be any quick results. --- Seven committees joint pressure indicates that someone is indeed using privacy coins for donations... that's what they truly fear. --- The Electoral Commission says technology can't be regulated, so what's the point of the ban? They’ll just switch to different disguises.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaSunglassesvip
· 01-12 00:41
Coming back to ban crypto again? British politicians are playing this trick over and over, thinking we can't see through it.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)