According to the central bank's leadership, recent criticism doesn't hold water—there's simply no factual basis linking the supposed issue to either his public remarks or the facility upgrades. Just standard political noise.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PanicSeller69
· 01-12 18:50
Nah, this is just the old trick of the official passing the buck, "no basis" and that's it? LOL
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorker
· 01-12 01:04
Blaming others again, that's funny.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleDreamer
· 01-12 01:04
It's just political noise; this kind of scapegoating has been old news for a long time... Can the central bank's statements stand up to scrutiny?
View OriginalReply0
Layer3Dreamer
· 01-12 01:02
theoretically speaking, if we model this as a state verification problem... the central bank's essentially claiming their cross-chain narrative is consistent, right? but ngl, without seeing the actual proof structure here, it kinda feels like they're just running an unverified state transition lmao. where's the recursive SNARK to back this up?
Reply0
ThreeHornBlasts
· 01-12 00:35
It's the same old excuse, blaming it on "political noise"... Just listen to it.
According to the central bank's leadership, recent criticism doesn't hold water—there's simply no factual basis linking the supposed issue to either his public remarks or the facility upgrades. Just standard political noise.