Expanding market coverage leads to increased trading volume, and higher trading volume directly boosts platform fee revenue. A portion of these fees is used for buyback and burn of $HYPE tokens. This creates a virtuous cycle — the more markets there are, the more active the trading, the larger the burn scale, and the greater the token scarcity.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ILCollector
· 01-12 02:51
What is it? Isn't it just active trading → platform making money → token burning → increased scarcity... but can it really continue?
View OriginalReply0
MetaDreamer
· 01-12 02:46
Oh no, this set of logic sounds perfect, but I'm worried that executing it might be another story.
View OriginalReply0
SilentAlpha
· 01-12 02:45
It's the true flywheel effect. I really like this kind of self-reinforcing logic.
View OriginalReply0
HashBard
· 01-12 02:32
ah so it's the classic flywheel narrative... more markets → more volume → more fees → more burns → scarcity → moon. seen this story told a hundred times tbh, the question is whether the execution actually matches the poetry or if we're just watching another cycle of tokenomics theater 🎭
Reply0
LuckyBearDrawer
· 01-12 02:29
The destruction mechanism sounds good, but I'm worried about poor execution.
Expanding market coverage leads to increased trading volume, and higher trading volume directly boosts platform fee revenue. A portion of these fees is used for buyback and burn of $HYPE tokens. This creates a virtuous cycle — the more markets there are, the more active the trading, the larger the burn scale, and the greater the token scarcity.