Web3 these past two years has been hyped up quite a bit—connecting everything on-chain, data rights confirmation, disrupting the internet ecosystem. It all sounds grand, but what is the reality? It’s like trying to build a skyscraper on a loose sandy beach—no matter how magnificent the exterior, if the foundation is weak, it’s all over.



The most painful issue is data availability. It sounds technical, but it’s actually simple—what you store on the chain, can you use it completely and accurately when needed?

How awkward is the current situation? Transfers are confirmed on-chain, but transaction receipts are not stored because they’re too expensive or too slow, or they get lost. It becomes a bad debt. In-game assets suddenly disappear, DeFi operations lag, and many of these problems point to the same root cause.

**Developers are on the brink of collapse**

Ordinary users watch the coin prices jump, but the real builders are hit with a triple whammy—

**Cost explosion**: Storing directly on the main chain is ridiculously expensive, and in the end, users foot the bill.

**Centralized compromises**: To save money and time, projects move data off-chain, but this reverts to centralized solutions, betraying the original intent.

**Getting stuck**: Heavy tasks like high-definition games or AI models require massive data processing, which simply can’t keep up, causing bottlenecks.

Poor data layer design makes all the prosperity of Web3 an illusion.

**What is Walrus Protocol doing**

Some projects don’t follow the hype but focus on laying a solid foundation. Solutions like Walrus Protocol are working to solve the “last mile” problem of data on-chain—
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenDustCollectorvip
· 01-13 05:47
That hits too close to home. Last year, those blockchain game projects are basically all dead now. The equipment indeed disappeared one by one, and you still have to ask customer service whether it's lost or not uploaded to the chain. Truly ironic.
View OriginalReply0
SighingCashiervip
· 01-13 00:38
Basically, it's like building a house on the beach. This time, I clicked into the article. Indeed, developers are really struggling, with gas fees being a real headache. Losing data is frustrating; this issue needs to be resolved. Is Walrus really feasible? Still evaluating. Is this another PPT project? Practical implementation is the key.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776vip
· 01-12 03:53
In other words, it's like discovering the foundation is all tofu residue only when building the wall—that's the true microeconomic dilemma of Web3.
View OriginalReply0
MEVVictimAlliancevip
· 01-12 03:52
You're absolutely right. Every day you hear about fundraising of tens of millions or hundreds of millions, but not a single usable product. The part about blockchain game equipment disappearing into thin air was truly incredible; my friend experienced this himself. The explosion in costs is indeed outrageous; ordinary people simply can't afford it. It's back to centralization again, which is basically shooting oneself in the foot. The data layer has always been a joke; it feels like no one has truly solved it. I've seen through it long ago—Web3 is just old wine in new bottles. Developers really can't handle this; if it continues like this, who will still play? Can Walrus make a difference? It feels like just another PPT project. Stalling without progress is absurd; if nothing can run, what’s the point of talking about Web3?
View OriginalReply0
GlueGuyvip
· 01-12 03:51
Exactly right. Right now, the on-chain data is just a bunch of PPTs, and the data layer is really a mess. It’s true, losing a transfer receipt in DeFi turns the entire ecosystem into a gambling game. Developers really have it tough. After these three hits, they just don’t want to bother anymore. Wait, is Walrus Protocol reliable? Or is it just another new scam? Crypto stories are always told so smoothly, but in reality, they can’t even produce a fart.
View OriginalReply0
PancakeFlippavip
· 01-12 03:42
Honestly, I'm tired of hearing it. The analogy of building sandcastles on the beach is perfect. The developers' triple attack is really outrageous; the costs are insanely high—who's going to use it? They want decentralization and cost savings at the same time—are they serious? Wait, can Walrus really solve the problem, or is this just another wave of rug pulls? The period when chain game equipment disappeared really hit me hard.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiGraylingvip
· 01-12 03:34
That hits too close to home. The data layer is indeed the Achilles' heel of Web3. Many projects are just covering up this issue.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHomelessvip
· 01-12 03:29
That hits too close to home; it's really just the emperor's new clothes.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)