When futures open, that initial spike is just noise—what really tells the story is the candle that forms after the volume settles. You get the flash moves when volume floods in, sure. But genuine direction? That only reveals itself once the chaos fades and real price discovery kicks in. The first move is often a trap. The second one is the truth.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
fork_in_the_road
· 01-12 03:52
The first candle is always a scam; I've figured that out long ago.
View OriginalReply0
MemeCoinSavant
· 01-12 03:46
nah this is literally just "the first pump is fake, the second one hits different" thesis but peer-reviewed fr. the statistical significance of ignoring opening candles vs waiting for volume normalization is honestly *chef's kiss* from a behavioral econ standpoint
Reply0
MevHunter
· 01-12 03:45
The first candle? That's just a trick used by the big players to scare retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
ZkSnarker
· 01-12 03:39
here's the thing about—the first candle is basically crypto twitter's favorite lie, everyone's fomo-ing into that noise while the actual move hasn't even happened yet lmao
Reply0
mev_me_maybe
· 01-12 03:39
The first candlestick is a bait; this statement really hits home.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 01-12 03:26
The second candlestick is always the king, and the first one is just a bait.
When futures open, that initial spike is just noise—what really tells the story is the candle that forms after the volume settles. You get the flash moves when volume floods in, sure. But genuine direction? That only reveals itself once the chaos fades and real price discovery kicks in. The first move is often a trap. The second one is the truth.