#私钥与钱包安全漏洞 The DeBot wallet private key theft incident just occurred, with $255,000 worth of assets transferred by hackers. This has taught us a profound lesson. Many people ask me how to view this; honestly, this is not a Web3 problem, but rather a reflection of our insufficient security awareness.
The core insight from this event is: **Decentralization does not mean zero risk; self-managed assets require self-discipline**. In the Web3 world, the private key is your absolute control over your assets, but it also means 100% responsibility lies with you. No bank will back you up, which is the essence of decentralization—freedom and risk go hand in hand.
I want to emphasize a few practical experiences:
**First, don't put all your eggs in one basket**. Use small wallets for high-risk interactions, and store daily assets in cold wallets or multi-signature wallets. This is not over-caution; it's basic risk management.
**Second, be wary of any interactions that require authorization**. Abuse of approve permissions is a common tactic among hackers. Before granting any authorization, ask yourself: does this contract really need unlimited access?
**Third, official compensation promises are worth looking forward to, but real protection still depends on your own security habits**. DeBot promises 100% full compensation, which shows the project's responsibility, but in the long run, we need to develop the skill of "not giving hackers opportunities."
The future of Web3 will definitely be secure, but only if each of us becomes our own "Chief Security Officer." This process may be a bit tiring, but it is precisely the power that decentralization grants us.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
#私钥与钱包安全漏洞 The DeBot wallet private key theft incident just occurred, with $255,000 worth of assets transferred by hackers. This has taught us a profound lesson. Many people ask me how to view this; honestly, this is not a Web3 problem, but rather a reflection of our insufficient security awareness.
The core insight from this event is: **Decentralization does not mean zero risk; self-managed assets require self-discipline**. In the Web3 world, the private key is your absolute control over your assets, but it also means 100% responsibility lies with you. No bank will back you up, which is the essence of decentralization—freedom and risk go hand in hand.
I want to emphasize a few practical experiences:
**First, don't put all your eggs in one basket**. Use small wallets for high-risk interactions, and store daily assets in cold wallets or multi-signature wallets. This is not over-caution; it's basic risk management.
**Second, be wary of any interactions that require authorization**. Abuse of approve permissions is a common tactic among hackers. Before granting any authorization, ask yourself: does this contract really need unlimited access?
**Third, official compensation promises are worth looking forward to, but real protection still depends on your own security habits**. DeBot promises 100% full compensation, which shows the project's responsibility, but in the long run, we need to develop the skill of "not giving hackers opportunities."
The future of Web3 will definitely be secure, but only if each of us becomes our own "Chief Security Officer." This process may be a bit tiring, but it is precisely the power that decentralization grants us.