Doxx = Satoshi Nakamoto? The Bitcoin Community Is Once Again Hyping the "Identity Mystery"

Jack Dorsey’s name has recently been in the spotlight again, but not because of his business achievements, rather because the crypto community is treating him as the latest candidate for "Bitcoin’s creator Satoshi Nakamoto." This line of argument comes from media personality Shawn Murray, who lists a series of seemingly coincidental details in an attempt to prove that this Twitter co-founder is the mysterious crypto punk.

**Dorsey’s Unlikely Connection to Cryptography**

This argument is quite intriguing. According to Murray’s analysis, Jack Dorsey started delving into cryptography as early as 1996 when he was still a college student, even wearing a T-shirt with an image of Adam Back. Adam Back is the inventor of Hashcash technology, which directly influenced Bitcoin’s proof-of-work mechanism. In 2001, Dorsey wrote a manifesto expressing a desire to be anonymously recorded in history, which somewhat echoes Satoshi Nakamoto’s low-profile and mysterious style.

**Are These "Suspected Evidence" Really Valid?**

Murray’s "evidence" includes many coincidences. Satoshi Nakamoto’s registration date on Bitcoin forums coincides exactly with Dorsey’s birthday; the timestamps of Bitcoin’s source code are concentrated around 4 a.m., a time also appearing in Dorsey’s social media data; most interestingly, one of Satoshi’s Bitcoin addresses begins with "jD2m," which some interpret as a possible reference to Dorsey’s connection to 2 Mint Plaza in San Francisco. There are even claims that Satoshi Nakamoto’s real IP address was exposed in an IRC chat in 2009, showing a location in California, where Dorsey was also present at the time.

At first glance, these coincidences are quite striking, but upon closer inspection, with millions of people in the sample, it’s easy to find some coincidences. It’s like saying "I share a birthday with a celebrity, so I might be them"—a logically flawed argument.

**Two Voices in the Community**

Interestingly, the crypto community doesn’t buy into this line of reasoning. Opponents point out that Dorsey’s content moderation policies on Twitter are precisely contrary to Satoshi Nakamoto’s advocacy for decentralization and free speech. If Dorsey really were Satoshi, how could he implement censorship on his own platform?

Meanwhile, analysts from certain research institutions believe that confirming Satoshi’s true identity faces too many technical hurdles; relying solely on these indirect clues is far from sufficient. The complexity of privacy tech and IP masking means that even with numerous "clues," it’s very difficult to reach a definitive conclusion.

**The "Guessing Game" of Satoshi Nakamoto’s Identity**

This isn’t the first time Jack Dorsey has been listed as a candidate for Satoshi Nakamoto, nor will it be the last. Previously, some suggested that a certain exchange might hold the key to Satoshi’s identity; a well-known documentary pointed to Canadian programmer Peter Todd, but Todd has always denied it. Every so often, the community sparks a new "identity hunt," bringing various well-known figures into the mix.

This phenomenon reflects the enduring curiosity about Bitcoin’s creator. But honestly, Satoshi Nakamoto’s choice to remain anonymous may have its own deep meaning—maintaining mystery at certain moments is, in itself, a form of power.

From Dorsey’s perspective, his interest in cryptography is genuine, but that’s far from enough to prove his identity. And every "detective game" in the crypto community is often more interesting than the truth itself.