BREAKING: Justice Clarence Thomas just delivered a devastating blow in his dissent on the tariff ruling, exposing the harsh truth of the majority's stance and brilliantly defending President Trump's "America First" authority!
He didn't beat around the bush. He straightforwardly stated: “Both the text of the law and the Constitution provide no basis to rule against the President.” BOOM. Read that sentence again. The Constitution and the law support Trump—there's no justification to the contrary. Thomas continued his attack: “Congress authorized the President to ‘regulate... imports.’ Throughout American history, the power to ‘regulate imports’ has been understood to include the authority to impose tariffs on imported goods.” Historical truth doesn't care about the feelings of globalists. He further emphasized: “The meaning of that phrase was beyond doubt at the time Congress enacted this law, immediately after the tariffs publicly announced by President Nixon were MAINTAINED based on exactly the same language.” Nixon did that. The court said YES. The same exact wording. The case is closed. Then came the knockout punch: “Therefore, the law on which the President relied authorized him to impose the disputed tariffs in these cases.” Crystal clear.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
BREAKING: Justice Clarence Thomas just delivered a devastating blow in his dissent on the tariff ruling, exposing the harsh truth of the majority's stance and brilliantly defending President Trump's "America First" authority!
He didn't beat around the bush. He straightforwardly stated:
“Both the text of the law and the Constitution provide no basis to rule against the President.”
BOOM. Read that sentence again. The Constitution and the law support Trump—there's no justification to the contrary.
Thomas continued his attack:
“Congress authorized the President to ‘regulate... imports.’ Throughout American history, the power to ‘regulate imports’ has been understood to include the authority to impose tariffs on imported goods.”
Historical truth doesn't care about the feelings of globalists.
He further emphasized:
“The meaning of that phrase was beyond doubt at the time Congress enacted this law, immediately after the tariffs publicly announced by President Nixon were MAINTAINED based on exactly the same language.”
Nixon did that. The court said YES. The same exact wording. The case is closed.
Then came the knockout punch:
“Therefore, the law on which the President relied authorized him to impose the disputed tariffs in these cases.”
Crystal clear.