Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
#GoldmanSachsFilesBitcoinIncomeETF #GatePreIPOsLaunchesWithSpaceX
If future public chain competition no longer revolves around transaction speed TPS, but rather around who is best suited to run artificial intelligence, what will happen?
Looking at @0G_labs, this issue becomes more specific. It’s not about building a faster chain, but about shifting blockchain’s positioning from the execution layer to the infrastructure layer for artificial intelligence.
Traditional public chains focus on transactions and contracts, but AI requires high-frequency computations, massive data, and continuous inference capabilities. These needs conflict with the original design of the chain.
@0G’s approach is to divide computations, storage, and data availability into independent units, and redesign the infrastructure to handle AI workloads.
This has a structural impact on the industry. Blockchain is no longer just a settlement network; it has begun to carry real computational tasks, especially AI inferences.
From a user experience perspective, this change will have a direct impact. Developers no longer need to run AI off-chain and retrieve it via APIs; they can now build everything within the same environment. Data, models, and execution paths are unified.
If this model proves correct, the core competition in future public chains will not only be performance but also who can truly support complex computations. @0G is pushing the chain from financial infrastructure to computational infrastructure.
@Galxe @GalxeQuest @easydotfunX @wallchain #Ad #Affiliate
When looking at @0G_labs, this question becomes very specific. They are not building a faster chain but are shifting the positioning of blockchain from the execution layer to the AI infrastructure layer.
Traditional public chains focus on transactions and contracts, but AI requires high-frequency computation, large-scale data, and continuous inference capabilities. These needs conflict with the original design of the chain.
0G's approach is to split computation, storage, and data availability into independent modules, redesigning the underlying architecture for AI workloads.
The impact on the industry is structural. Blockchain is no longer just a settlement network but begins to carry real computing tasks, especially AI inference.
From a user experience perspective, this change will be very direct. Developers no longer need to put AI off-chain and then interface it back on-chain, but can complete the build within the same environment. Data, models, and execution paths are unified.
If this model proves valid, the core competition of future public chains will no longer be just performance, but who can truly support complex computation. 0G is pushing chains from financial infrastructure toward computing infrastructure.
@Galxe @GalxeQuest @easydotfunX @wallchain #Ad #Affiliate