Things that Open AI founder Sam Altman doesn't want you to know! Is the AI utopia about to shatter?

AI big tech OpenAI founder Sam Altman recently exhibited unusual excitement during an interview, leaving many curious about whether he truly worries about the future of AI when faced with skepticism, or if he is primarily concerned with money. Altman proposed what seems like a dreamy deal, believing that AI can provide everything humanity needs, and the future world will be a utopia where AI can solve issues like the housing crisis, cancer, poverty, and even climate change. However, the cost behind all these beautiful deals may be entirely based on “future money,” and humanity may even have to give up precious personal data and Earth resources! This article is excerpted from What Sam Altman Doesn’t Want You To Know (, a summary and reflection of the key points from the video about what OpenAI founder Sam Altman doesn’t want you to know! ).

Huge investments and future commitments

Sam Altman proposed that the devil's deal is like a gamble. According to him, OpenAI plans to invest over $1 trillion in building artificial intelligence infrastructure over the next eight years, but currently, OpenAI's annual revenue is only about $13 billion, which is less than 1% of the promised expenditure. Nevertheless, Altman still assures the world that as long as sufficient funding and resources are provided, the future will see energy costs approaching zero, leaps in healthcare quality, greater social equality, and solutions to most of the challenges humanity faces, such as the “housing crisis.” But the question is, are these promises really possible to achieve? Can we fully trust Altman?

Sam Altman's personal trust crisis

Looking back at Sam Altman's early experiences, his business career was filled with questionable “bro, trust me, I can do it” type deals. Altman's first big deal was selling his startup Loopt to Green Dot. Loopt was a location-based service company, but the actual number of users was far lower than the numbers Altman claimed, with only 500 users. This deal raised quite a bit of controversy, especially since Green Dot did not utilize Loopt's technology, leading to questions about Altman's integrity.

Sam Altman was recognized by Peter Thiel, and with Peter Thiel's help, he secured millions of dollars to start his own venture capital firm, Hydrazine. According to the New York Times, as much as 75% of Hydrazine's funding is invested in companies under YC. However, Sam Altman's relationship with YC is not simple; according to the video's explanation, he had used his influence at YC to engage in cross-investment, which was also the controversy at the time.

OpenAI transitioned from a non-profit organization to a for-profit company.

OpenAI was initially established as a non-profit organization, with the mission of having a primary responsibility to humanity and a commitment to avoiding the misuse of artificial intelligence. However, over time, OpenAI began to show a trend towards commercialization. In 2019, OpenAI started to abandon its non-profit nature and established a for-profit subsidiary, a shift that raised questions about its original intentions.

In 2024, OpenAI further divested its profit-driven branch and brought in large investors, including Microsoft and Nvidia. Microsoft invested $13 billion in OpenAI, with the funds primarily used to purchase Microsoft products. This series of actions demonstrates that OpenAI's financial operations are increasingly reliant on big tech companies and consortiums, raising a thought-provoking question of whether the interests of these companies align with those of the public.

Resource data and future energy and environmental risks

One of Sam Altman's trading conditions is that we need to hand over a large amount of data, which will be the core resource for OpenAI's development of artificial intelligence technology. To achieve this goal, Sam Altman and the investors behind him will even touch upon the control of global energy and resources. For example, OpenAI expects to require 250 gigawatts of computing power, which will require electricity equivalent to that of the entire population of India. One of the solutions proposed by Sam Altman is to invest in nuclear energy, which not only will have an impact on the environment but may also concentrate the world's energy demands in the hands of a few large corporations and wealthy individuals.

In addition, Sam Altman seems to have not provided effective solutions to the challenges brought by artificial intelligence, such as unemployment, economic collapse, and data abuse. His other project, Worldcoin, attempts to address wealth distribution issues through cryptocurrency, but the feasibility and fairness of this plan are also questionable.

Should we trust Sam Altman?

Sam Altman's promises appear appealing, and the future blueprint he proposes is undoubtedly attractive. However, based on past experiences and the operational methods of OpenAI, whether such a deal is trustworthy remains a big question mark. When we hand over all resources and data to a single entity, does such centralization truly bring welfare to the world? This is a question that must be deeply considered. In this context, can everyone trust Sam Altman? If these promises ultimately turn out to be like a utopian ideal, what price will we pay?

This article is about what Open AI founder Sam Altman doesn't want you to know! Is the AI utopia about to fade away? First appeared in Chain News ABMedia.