Major scandals and controversies can act as turning points for any organization in crypto. When things go wrong, the real test isn't just damage control—it's whether there's genuine appetite for systemic change. We're seeing projects and platforms seriously reconsider their governance structures, operational transparency, and community trust frameworks after getting caught in rough waters. The question becomes: are these reforms just PR moves, or do they signal meaningful operational shifts? For builders and community members watching from the sidelines, it's worth paying attention to whether leadership actually follows through or if things just settle back into old patterns once the noise dies down. Real change takes time, but the intent matters from day one.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ShortingEnthusiastvip
· 2025-12-18 13:12
Don't talk to me about systemic change. Has this circle ever changed? It's just waiting for the hype to pass and then sticking to the old ways.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicatorvip
· 2025-12-16 08:50
Laughing to death, it's that same old "we need reform" rhetoric, heard it too many times.
View OriginalReply0
SleepyValidatorvip
· 2025-12-16 08:38
Honestly, most projects just talk about reform but after the hype dies down, they go back to the old ways... How many of them will actually make real changes this time?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)