There's growing debate around AI infrastructure expansion. Some policymakers argue that before we scale up data centers massively, we need to address who actually benefits from these advances. The concern: will the gains from AI technology be widely distributed, or concentrated among a few tech giants? This touches on a broader question about how we balance innovation growth with equitable access to the fruits of technological progress.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 2
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
pumpamentalistvip
· 12-17 09:50
It's the same old story again, expand first and then regulate? Tech giants have long been full, and we're still discussing fair distribution.
View OriginalReply0
DiamondHandsvip
· 12-17 09:25
Huh? Same old story, big companies have already made a fortune, and you're still talking about fair sharing. --- Honestly, policy makers are still in a daze. By the time they finish discussing, OpenAI will have already monopolized everything. --- I just want to know, what can ordinary people get a share of... --- It's wishful thinking, my friend. Concentration of benefits has been a foregone conclusion for a long time. It's too late to discuss now. --- It's funny—expanding while discussing fairness. Isn't that self-deception? --- Instead of worrying about how to divide, why not ask how retail investors can get on board? --- Wait, this problem isn't new at all. When the internet came, it was also talked about like this. What was the result?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)