2025-12-17 21:25:28

Have you noticed that some people can be incredibly thorough when researching projects? They dig through technical documents, explore code repositories, and even go as far as delving into the founders' career histories on LinkedIn. Really, sometimes this due diligence spirit is impressive, but it can also be a bit... how should I say, over the top. But then again, in this risky crypto market, such cautiousness is understandable.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CafeMinor

· 12-20 19:29

Ha, once you've been rug pulled, you end up like this, I understand.

View OriginalReply0

rekt_but_resilient

· 12-17 21:55

Haha, really. Some people research projects more seriously than they do gossip, flipping through ten pages on LinkedIn. --- I respect this thorough due diligence spirit, but sometimes it can go a bit too far, right? --- Instead of researching what the founder had for breakfast, it’s better to look at the token economic model. --- You do need to be cautious in crypto, but don’t make it seem like you’re doing FBI background checks. --- This is hilarious. Someone even asked about the founder’s high school classmates—I’m amazed. --- I can understand, after all, many people have been rug-pulled in the crypto space, but the cost of doing this is never finding a project. --- Overly thorough due diligence can also be a form of anxiety. Instead of researching the founder, it’s better to check the liquidity. --- I actually think that people who can do such in-depth research probably won’t fall for obvious scams. --- Haha, some people’s obsession with researching projects has long surpassed due diligence and entered the realm of obsession. --- Come to think of it, everyone wants to avoid getting rekt, but in the end, the big players who do this are just trading on information gaps and selling stories.

View OriginalReply0

SmartContractPlumber

· 12-17 21:55

Haha, I see it the other way around. Code audits are a thousand times more important than founder gossip. Some people waste time on LinkedIn profiles but ignore reentrancy vulnerabilities in smart contracts—that's truly going overboard.

View OriginalReply0