🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
Many people are still debating whether the "model performance is enough," but in reality, whether a system can truly run and be trustworthy depends not on individual components, but on who is guarding the gate.
Imagine a film or TV production. Just having the director's approval? That's far from enough. Cinematographers, screenwriters, colorists, sound teams—each step requires someone to oversee it to ensure the final product passes inspection. Otherwise, a failure is only a matter of time. Relying on a single perspective can never reveal all hidden vulnerabilities.
This logic is even more applicable in on-chain systems. Multi-signature verification, multi-layer consensus, distributed auditing—these mechanisms fundamentally use structured design to prevent single points of failure. Instead of betting on the quality of a single output, it's better to trust a proven, tested system. Like projects such as Mira Network—by implementing multi-dimensional verification frameworks, they build the entire system's trustworthiness on decentralized checks and balances.
Ultimately, trust shouldn't come from "how smart it is," but from "whether enough people are watching."