2025-12-21 16:21:25

Are you still chasing those coins that are rising against the trend? Why not take a look at this real case.

In mid-November, analysts pointed out that the phenomenon of Hype and Aster rising against the backdrop of a general market decline is unsustainable, predicting that these two coins will see more attractive prices in 2026.

Time proves everything. At that time, Aster was quoted at 1.4, but now it has dropped to 0.7, a complete halving. The situation for Hype is equally bleak, dropping from 37U to 24U, a decline of 40%.

This is not to say whose judgment is more accurate, but to remind that coins that perform outstandingly against the trend often hide risks behind them. Market trends can reverse in an instant, and following the trend to chase highs and blindly bottom-fishing are both high-risk operations. True wisdom may lie in recognizing the trend, rather than being misled by short-term fluctuations. Those seemingly risk-free opportunities can sometimes be the most dangerous traps.

HYPE-1.1%

ASTER-2.64%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
2
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CodeAuditQueen

· 4h ago

There are still people shouting "buy the dip" during a sharp decline, which is like a reentrancy vulnerability in smart contracts—looks profitable but is actually a bottomless pit. Counter-trend performance is often that backdoor; be cautious.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 12-21 16:46

Ha, it's the same old rhetoric again. The rise against the trend is essentially a signal of the failure of the market pricing mechanism, nothing surprising about it. In simple terms, it's about incompatible incentives—the motivation for funds to chase the price is severely disconnected from the fundamentals, and it will eventually have to return to equilibrium. Aster's direct 50% Slump is actually the process of correcting the lack of governance framework and risk premium. The key issue is that everyone is betting on financial magic and is unwilling to examine whether there are problems with the mechanism itself. --- Demonizing coins that rise against the trend is pointless; the problem lies in the liquidity design of the exchange and the incentive mechanisms of the project party. --- Another case study of "my judgment is accurate"... it's really just a probability game; don't package luck as wisdom. --- A 50% Slump like this doesn't scare people; after all, some will see it as an "opportunity to buy the dip." The real problem is—no one wants to establish a constrained risk management framework; everyone wants the Schrödinger-style high returns with low risk. --- This article is right but not thorough; the key question is why such counter-trend targets can attract so much capital? What problems are there in the incentive design behind it? Is no one doing the math?

View OriginalReply0