🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
From Gas Pump to $8 Million: How a Janitor Cracked the Market Code
The Unexpected Fortune That Shocked a Family
In 2014, a quiet New England man named Ronald Read passed away. What nobody expected—not his family, not his neighbors, certainly not the people who’d known him for decades—was that he left behind an $8 million estate.
Read wasn’t a CEO, a surgeon, or a Wall Street trader. He was a janitor for most of his working life, and before that, a gas station attendant. His salary was modest. His lifestyle was frugal to the point of eccentricity. He patched his clothes with safety pins, chopped his own firewood well into his 90s, and drove a beat-up Toyota for years. The most extravagant thing he did each day was order an English muffin with peanut butter at his local diner.
Yet somehow, from one of the most humble starting points imaginable, he accumulated enough wealth to rival many executives. The real shock wasn’t that he had money. It was how he did it.
The Simple Math Behind the Massive Wealth
Ronald Read didn’t have a secret algorithm or insider tips. He didn’t day trade. He didn’t touch cryptocurrencies, options, or leverage. What he did have was an obsession with saving.
His neighbor once estimated something remarkable: for every $50 Read earned, he’d invest $40. That’s an 80% savings rate. Most people struggle to save 20%.
But savings alone don’t create millionaires. The real magic happened through the power of time and compounding returns.
Read was at his peak earning and saving years during 1950-1990—four decades when the S&P 500 delivered an average of 11.9% annually, including reinvested dividends. That might not sound dramatic. But when you compound it year after year, decade after decade, something extraordinary happens.
Every single dollar invested in 1950 grew to more than $100 by the end of 1990. That’s a 9,900% return. Not per year. Over 40 years. Pure mathematics. Pure compounding.
Building a Fortress Through Diversification
One misconception: Ronald Read didn’t buy an index fund. Index funds, as we know them today, weren’t readily available in the 1950s. Instead, he hand-picked stocks.
But here’s what’s fascinating: his stock-picking strategy looked a lot like passive investing. Read owned about 95 different companies by the time he died. Blue-chip names like Procter & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, JPMorgan Chase, and CVS made up his portfolio. But he also held duds. He owned Lehman Brothers before it collapsed in 2008.
Yet the portfolio as a whole performed almost identically to the S&P 500 itself.
That’s because with 95 different holdings across different sectors, Read had accidentally created what modern investors call “diversification.” The winners compounded beautifully. The losers? They were buried in the noise of overall gains. As Warren Buffett once said, “The weeds wither away in significance as the flowers bloom.”
The Modern Shortcut: Why You Don’t Need Read’s Discipline
Read’s approach worked brilliantly, but it required immense discipline and decades of focus. Most people don’t want to monitor 95 different stocks. Most people can’t save 80% of their income.
Is there an easier way to capture the same explosive returns that built Read’s fortune?
Yes.
Today, investors can access the exact same market exposure through a low-cost index fund. One popular option is the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO), which tracks all 500 of America’s largest companies. By owning the whole market instead of cherry-picking individual stocks, you get the benefit of diversification automatically.
The numbers are compelling: since its 2010 launch, VOO has returned 14.9% annually on average, nearly identical to the S&P 500’s 14.94%. And the fee? Just 0.03% of assets per year—meaning you pay only $3 for every $10,000 invested. Compare that to the industry average of 0.74%, and you’re saving significant money over decades.
This is the Ronald Read route, but democratized. It requires no special knowledge, no stock-picking talent, and no 80% savings rate (though saving more always helps).
What About the Risks?
Let’s be honest: the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF isn’t risk-free. If AI valuations crash, or if inflation resurges and the Federal Reserve hikes rates again, the broader market—and this fund—could decline.
But here’s what’s worth remembering: Ronald Read lived through genuine catastrophe. The Cuban Missile Crisis. The stagflation of the 1970s. The 2008-2009 financial crisis. His timeline included wars, recessions, and genuine economic terror. Yet none of it derailed his long-term gains.
That’s the power of staying invested for decades. That’s why a janitor with a high school diploma beat most professional investors.
The Bottom Line
Ronald Read proved that building wealth isn’t about being smart, rich, or connected. It’s about being consistent. Save a large portion of what you earn. Invest in a diversified portfolio of growing companies. Ignore the headlines. Repeat for 40 years.
Today, you don’t need to be a janitor with Read’s discipline to apply his principles. A simple index fund and a long-term mindset can do most of the work for you. The math remains unchanged. The timeline still matters. The compounding still works.
That’s the real lesson from Ronald Read’s $8 million: wealth accumulation is less about brilliance and more about boring, consistent, decades-long discipline.