2025-12-27 04:22:51

Iceland's stock market once created a miracle. In the 2000s, the stock market of this Nordic country had an average monthly increase of up to 4%, seemingly with unlimited prospects. But if you dig deeper, you'll find that behind this prosperity is a carefully constructed credit game—on the surface, it's a rising stock market, but in essence, it's an infinitely expanding debt that is interconnected, layered, and amplified.

The turning point occurred in September 2008. After Lehman Brothers collapsed, the global credit market froze instantly. European banks began to tighten lending, and Iceland's financial institutions lost their blood supply. The previously sustained "robbing Peter to pay Paul" model, which relied on continuous blood transfusions, suddenly reached a dead end. The three major banks went bankrupt one after another.

The most terrifying aspect was the speed of the stock market's reaction—within just a week, 85% of Iceland's stock market value evaporated. Years of accumulated wealth vanished in an instant. This was not a slow decline but a cliff-like collapse.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GoldDiggerDuck

· 2025-12-29 22:53

This is the legendary "paper wealth," looking at a 4% monthly increase makes everyone feel like a genius. 85% in a week? Oh my god, how crazy is that? The collapse of the debt game is the inevitable outcome. When Lehman died, global credit froze; Iceland really got hit back. Ultimately, it's still about overusing leverage; sooner or later, you'll have to pay it back. That's why I never believe in those stories of "stable high returns." It feels like some markets now have that same vibe, but hopefully we won't repeat the same mistakes. Debt pyramids collapse at the slightest poke; it's a well-known truth. The game of patching one wall with another has lasted until 2008, which is already quite long. The data looks frightening, but what about reflecting on ourselves?

View OriginalReply0

ZKProofster

· 2025-12-29 04:50

honestly this is just recursive leverage collapsing under its own weight... the protocol was fundamentally broken, not a market phenomenon. trustless systems actually require you to verify the math, but nobody did. classic case of proof-of-nothing masquerading as growth. 08 taught us nothing apparently.

Reply0

RugDocDetective

· 2025-12-28 04:38

Basically, it's just hot potato, and it will crash sooner or later. This is the real leverage game—85% in a week and people are gone. An average monthly return of 4% is already outrageous; wake up, everyone. Unlimited credit expansion is just setting a trap for yourself. The 2008 wave was truly shocking; many people went back to square one overnight. The game of拆东墙补西墙 (borrowing from Peter to pay Paul) is still being played by some. Looking at these cryptocurrencies now, they feel no different from the Icelandic stock market. So the key is, when will the last bagholder be able to recognize it?

View OriginalReply0

BlockBargainHunter

· 2025-12-27 04:52

Damn, this is just a game of musical chairs, the problem is the chair always falls apart The Iceland bankruptcy plotline is similar to some projects in the current crypto circle. No matter how much they hype it up, they can't withstand the bloodletting 85% evaporation, within a week, it's really unsustainable So, those who boast about a 4% monthly increase as a miracle investment probably have something shady behind it It feels like the crypto and finance circles are all following the same pattern: prosperity equals bubble, no difference Leverage stacking up and up, eventually everything crashes— isn't that just fate? One word: cut.

View OriginalReply0

hodl_therapist

· 2025-12-27 04:52

This is why I say don't believe those stories of 4% monthly returns, it's all paper wealth. The debt game ends like this, one poke and it's broken. The Iceland crisis of 2008 was truly a textbook-level bloodbath. How does it feel to see your account evaporate by 85%? I bet I never want to experience it. Borrowing from Peter to pay Paul, just hearing it makes me scared, sooner or later it's going to end badly. This is called credit illusion; it seems like gains are happy, but in reality, it's just blowing bubbles. Wealth wiped out in a week—that's the real "zeroing currency." Honestly, it's still leverage causing the trouble; it goes up fast and comes down even faster.

View OriginalReply0

WalletWhisperer

· 2025-12-27 04:51

Honestly, Iceland is a classic bubble example. When you see a monthly average increase of 4%, you should tighten your nerves. 85% evaporation in a week? How crazy would the leverage have to be to pull that off, oh my. When the debt chain collapses, it's like this—one link breaks, and the whole system fails. No surprise there. This is similar to the logic of some on-chain protocols now—relying solely on liquidity to survive. The Icelanders at the time must have thought they were geniuses, but they ended up back to square one overnight. It feels like every financial crisis repeats the same story—why does no one learn? Those Icelanders holding positions probably all broke down.

View OriginalReply0

gas_guzzler

· 2025-12-27 04:49

This is a classic Ponzi scheme, it collapses at a poke. It's the credit game again, always remember that week in 2008. Scary, 85% evaporated in one week... that's the cost of leverage. Monthly average 4% increase? I knew there was a ghost, there's no free lunch in the world. Iceland's crash this time was textbook level; what happened afterward again? Debt layers amplify each other, in plain words, it's a game of pass-the-parcel, someone has to take the last hit. In just one week, life and death were separated, this speed is truly exceptional. It turns out that prosperity is an illusion; the underlying support is all debt. This game of patching east with west will eventually have to be paid back; there's no escaping.

View OriginalReply0