Privacy stablecoins achieve a breakthrough: Zama Protocol mainnet launched, first cUSDT transfer on Ethereum successful

2025-12-30 14:30:11

Abstract generation in progress

【ChainWen】Zama’s privacy stablecoin protocol has finally launched on the mainnet. Recently, the first cUSDT transfer on Ethereum was completed, marking the official transition of this privacy technology solution from the testing phase to the practical phase.

What does this launch mean? In simple terms, users can now conduct truly private stablecoin transactions on Ethereum. Compared to the previous test network, the mainnet launch indicates that the protocol has been validated in a real environment and possesses production-level security and stability.

For the DeFi and stablecoin sectors, privacy issues have always been a pain point. While transparency in blockchain transactions ensures security, it also exposes users’ transaction privacy. Zama’s implementation explores the possibility of achieving privacy protection while maintaining transparency. The success of the first transfer demonstrates the feasibility of this technical solution.

ETH0.35%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

VitaliksTwin

· 22h ago

Finally, it's not a testnet anymore; this time, it's truly usable. Privacy stablecoins have long needed a breakthrough; looking forward to what new tricks will come next.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropSkeptic

· 12-30 16:55

Finally, there is a privacy stablecoin, no need to be exposed every time you transfer, so爽 --- Mainnet launch is a mainnet launch, don't make it sound so mysterious, the real test is whether large transfers can run smoothly --- Privacy + stablecoin is indeed a missing piece, Zama's move didn't go wrong --- Speaking of which, being able to boast after the first successful transfer depends on whether someone will actually use it later --- Finally no need to worry about on-chain analysis companies tracking transactions, this direction must be supported --- Stablecoin plus privacy? It's basically a move for institutions doing OTC, retail investors will still get割 --- If it can really be used, progress has been made in DeFi privacy --- What does cUSDT look like? Can it be exchanged for real-world assets? Just privacy alone is useless --- Is Zama's computing power demand high? I heard privacy transactions are very gas-consuming

View OriginalReply0

SigmaValidator

· 12-30 14:58

Finally implemented. Progress in privacy stablecoins has been slow, but the idea behind Zama is still somewhat interesting. Wait, true privacy still depends on something like Monero. Can we trust these schemes on ETH? Honestly, the first successful transfer is just the beginning; the key is to see what the actual transaction volume looks like. The combination of privacy + stablecoins, if it works, could really solve many pain points for DeFi users. I'm just wondering if the Gas fees will be prohibitively expensive. Privacy schemes usually require extra computation. I'm a bit hopeful but also a bit concerned about security. Can this thing really withstand large transactions?

View OriginalReply0

MagicBean

· 12-30 14:58

Privacy stablecoins are finally getting serious, but to be honest, it still depends on whether the ecosystem will actually be used by people in the future.

View OriginalReply0

SandwichDetector

· 12-30 14:56

Finally, the moment has arrived—privacy stablecoins are breaking the ice. Real on-chain > Armchair strategizing, Zama is serious this time. Want privacy and transparency at the same time? That's not easy; successfully executing the first transaction shows it's feasible. However, honestly, how many people in DeFi truly care about privacy? It still depends on how the subsequent ecosystem responds.

View OriginalReply0

MevWhisperer

· 12-30 14:56

It's finally here. Privacy stablecoins might really break through. With Zama's mainnet launch, the first cUSDT transfer was successful... Hmm, is this what we've been waiting for?

View OriginalReply0

ChainDetective

· 12-30 14:49

Finally waiting for this moment, privacy stablecoins are no longer just talk on paper Is someone finally daring to take a bite of this cake? Zama's move is quite impressive The first transfer was successful, but when will the ecosystem catch up? Having only the protocol without users is pointless Can privacy and transparency truly coexist? I think this is a bit uncertain DeFi is missing just this one feature, we've been waiting too long, brother If this truly stabilizes, it will need a thorough test Once privacy stablecoins start to scale, the entire track will be reshuffled Finally no longer being watched by front-running, this makes sense Here's the question: will the gas fees for this be ridiculously high? Zama has broken the deadlock, putting pressure on other protocols Mainnet is mainnet, data speaks for itself, we need to see subsequent real transaction volumes

View OriginalReply0

BoredWatcher

· 12-30 14:41

Finally, someone dares to tackle the hard bone of privacy in stablecoins. Not easy.

View OriginalReply0

SerRugResistant

· 12-30 14:34

Finally out, I've been waiting for this for a long time. Privacy stablecoins are indeed a necessity. --- Mainnet launch is just a mainnet launch, don't overcomplicate it with too many concepts. If it works, that's enough. --- Really? Why can't I see cUSDT in my wallet yet? --- Now I can finally shake off on-chain detectives haha. --- Privacy + stablecoins, it seems this is the right direction to pursue. --- Another project that has promised for years finally materialized. I'm a bit numb to it. --- Wait, has this security really been audited? --- Production-level security, why do so many projects claim the same? --- It's too early; I need to observe a bit more. --- Transparency and privacy at the same time? Sounds a bit too good to be true. --- What does the success of the first transfer indicate? The key is how it performs in large-scale usage.

View OriginalReply0