2026-01-01 14:23:08

Why is Wallchain's ranking mechanism worth paying attention to?

Many people misunderstand — this is not a popularity voting chart. The ranking is based on real on-chain data: user interactions, ecosystem contributions, and actual adoption metrics.

Projects that can stay on the list long-term usually hit three points:

First, the product has practical implementation and is not just an empty concept.

Second, there are genuine interacting users, and the data is not artificially inflated.

Third, there is potential for adoption within the ecosystem, not existing in isolation.

Because this set of logic is strict, projects that make it onto the list are worth paying attention to. Compared to inflated hype, real on-chain behavior better demonstrates the situation.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
2
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForkItAll

· 10h ago

Someone finally said it: do real data deceive us? Shillers, tremble.

View OriginalReply0

DegenWhisperer

· 10h ago

We need to clarify this; this is the real sieve. Can real data deceive us? Pump-and-dump projects can't get in at all. Unlike those popularity charts, where anyone and everyone can jump to the top every day. This mechanism is really tough; isolated projects are directly eliminated. What I care about is how these projects that make the list perform afterward; continuous follow-up is necessary.

View OriginalReply0