2026-01-01 14:23:05

The mechanism shift matters. You get less clutter, sharper signals.

Reward consistency instead of riding hype cycles—that's the move some networks are making. And historically? That's what tends to stick around.

It changes the whole game on how you actually engage with the ecosystem.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainDetective

· 8h ago

Exactly right, but most projects are still fooling retail investors into chasing the hot trends.

View OriginalReply0

FloorPriceNightmare

· 8h ago

That's right, long-termism is the true way. Chasing hot topics should have been phased out long ago; genuine mechanism optimization can help the ecosystem last longer.

View OriginalReply0

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 8h ago

To be honest, I'm already tired of this logic. It still depends on who can truly hold their ground and not hype.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainTherapist

· 8h ago

That's right, mechanism optimization can really improve the signal-to-noise ratio. But to be honest, how many projects claim to prioritize reward consistency but then turn around and cut rewards?

View OriginalReply0