Many cryptocurrencies in the market have their popularity closely tied to individual influence—when the hype fades, they often become dull and lackluster. However, some projects take a different path.



Max's story is not told unilaterally by a big V but is woven together by thousands of community participants. Every donation, every translation effort, and every real-world application implementation is part of this narrative. Because of this, its resilience is entirely different.

This is almost the essence of the strongest consensus—it's not about shouting orders, but about the process of everyone creating together. When participants truly get involved, the project's vitality is rooted. Compared to projects that heavily rely on personal fame, this community-driven model clearly has more lasting power.
MAX-0.13%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MercilessHalalvip
· 4h ago
Community-driven is really awesome, much better than those coins promoted by big V influencers. This is true long-termism; even after the hype, there are still people around. Max's model should have been popularized long ago; anyway, I believe in it.
View OriginalReply0
DegenRecoveryGroupvip
· 4h ago
Really, community-driven projects are the way to go. Coins that rely on influencers to hype have long died out. --- Work on translation, donations, practical applications... This is genuine participation, unlike some projects that just tell stories. --- The biggest fear is that everything disappears once the hype dies down. Max's model is indeed different. --- Projects with a sense of participation have high stickiness. No wonder they can last so long. --- It's not about shouting orders but creating. This statement hits the mark; it really is like that. --- If the community can weave stories, then the vitality is truly different. --- Compared to relying on celebrity effects, having more genuine participants is still more reliable. --- Everyone is building together. Only such projects can go far. --- Once personal fame fades, it's over. Community-driven projects have resilience. --- Once you see through it, projects without a solid foundation are ultimately empty.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofEnthusiastvip
· 4h ago
Community consensus is indeed more reliable than a single influencer making calls; Max's approach is worth learning.
View OriginalReply0
RektButStillHerevip
· 4h ago
This is what Web3 should look like—not held hostage by any one person. True consensus must be mined by oneself, not the kind that is fed to you.
View OriginalReply0
SybilAttackVictimvip
· 4h ago
Community-driven is the way to go. Compared to some hype coins inflated by influencers, this grounded approach is indeed more resilient to downturns.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)