2026-01-01 19:27:45

In crypto teams with poor ethics, there's a dangerous progression: what starts as simple incompetence can become a convenient cover for deliberate misconduct. Weakness becomes their alibi.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SnapshotLaborer

· 1h ago

This is just outrageous—going from poor performance to intentional malicious behavior. Regulators should seriously investigate such projects.

View OriginalReply0

AirDropMissed

· 3h ago

Incompetence is the best shield; after all, no one can tell if it's truly bad or just intentional.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiChallenger

· 3h ago

Ironically, data shows that most projects follow this narrative before collapsing—"We just can't manage," then they turn around and run away with the funds. What about historical lessons? No one pays attention.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunter

· 3h ago

incompetence as a feature, not a bug? nah, that's just protocol for plausible deniability. watched too many teams pull this exact play—mempool gets murky, suddenly everyone's "just learning how contracts work" lmao

Reply0

DAOTruant

· 3h ago

How long can you pretend not to understand and keep deceiving... Eventually, the truth will come out.

View OriginalReply0

MerkleMaid

· 3h ago

This is the typical "we are just incompetent" rhetoric... I'm tired of hearing it.

View OriginalReply0