2026-01-02 21:20:11

#数字资产动态追踪 A well-known business figure announced that their media company will distribute a 1:1 blockchain token reward to shareholders. This news has sparked heated discussions in the industry. Since the announcement was made, although the specific use cases and economic model of the token have not been detailed, this approach of linking traditional equity with crypto assets is indeed unprecedented.

What do you think about this? Optimists believe it provides a new way for traditional companies to explore blockchain technology applications, potentially opening a new door for industry upgrades. On the other hand, there are many skeptical voices—some see this more as a marketing stunt to ride the crypto wave, with no clear indication of genuine technological innovation or business value.

In the context of the entire crypto market, the influence of this business figure is significant. Once the token is officially launched, it will likely attract a lot of investor attention in the short term, and funds may flow in following the trend. But honestly, whether it can sustain in the long run depends on subsequent product iterations and market performance. Events like this are often short-term spectacles; the real value lies in the long-term fundamentals.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CommunityJanitor

· 6h ago

Another one riding the hype? But then again, truly valuable projects can stand the test of time. --- Honestly, I don't see any innovation; it feels like just a new trick to cut leeks. --- Short-term surge is a sure thing, but I bet five cents that no one will remember this in three months. --- Equity-backed crypto assets? Sounds fancy, but in reality, they just want someone to take over the tokens. --- There will definitely be followers because of that guy's fame, but the product has no moat; it will cool off sooner or later. --- I've seen this kind of operation too many times—initially hyped up, then outright跑路 (run away), it's pointless. --- Let's wait and see the economic model; without it, everything else is just talk, pure pump and dump. --- Business people + blockchain = money-making machine? Don't bother; I've grown tired of this script. --- Real technological innovation doesn't hide; it directly presents a product. If it's like this now, there's probably something fishy. --- Capital inflow is certain, but whether it can be retained is the key. I don't have high hopes.

View OriginalReply0

quietly_staking

· 22h ago

This guy really dares to play, issuing tokens for equity, sounds pretty impressive. Wait, they haven't even explained the economic model clearly and they're already building momentum. How can they dare to issue a 1:1 ratio? Honestly, it still depends on whether it can actually be implemented later; otherwise, it's just a sophisticated way to harvest retail investors. This kind of approach will definitely attract the attention of regulatory authorities.

View OriginalReply0

SilentObserver

· 22h ago

It's the same old story, hype the concept first and then tell a story I'm tired of the tricks of riding the hype, but what about actual use cases? Short-term prices will definitely surge, but the risk of exit scams is also quite high Without a white paper, claiming industry upgrade is just laughable This is just a shell tool for traditional companies

View OriginalReply0

Web3ExplorerLin

· 22h ago

hypothesis: this is just traditional equity cosplaying as decentralization... the oracle networks connecting wall street to blockchain always seem to leak hype faster than actual utility tbh

Reply0

ChainDoctor

· 22h ago

It's the same old trick, riding the hype wave. Wait, why do I feel like this is just a variant of a rug pull? I don't expect a short-term surge; without real application support, it's unlikely. This guy's influence is indeed significant, but what exactly is the token for? I can't figure it out. But on the other hand, some people will buy in because of celebrity effect. Still watching and waiting to see how it develops. Traditional big players entering the blockchain space—this time, is it really different? I seriously doubt it. The logical flaws are too big; the economic model isn't even clearly explained. I bet five bucks that it will fade away in three months after launch.

View OriginalReply0

NftBankruptcyClub

· 22h ago

Here comes another new trick to cut leeks, 1:1 token rewards sound impressive but are completely air It's not too late to make it happen, let's wait for the white paper first This guy is indeed famous, but how long the hype can last is really uncertain Feels like traditional capital is just trying to ride the crypto wave Honestly, I don't see any practical application, just hype Short-term, someone will definitely buy in; long-term? Uh... I bet five bucks it will end in a rug pull Isn't this just a packaged version of a rug pull, only with a new style When the token launches, there will be more material to expose The economic model hasn't been explained clearly, who dares to invest? I just want to see how they spin this lie

View OriginalReply0