Klarna's playbook is deceptively simple but highly effective. The fintech company accumulated $13B in customer deposits by offering competitive interest rates around 3% at its Swedish banking arm. Smart move—it created a stable, low-cost funding source. Then comes the revenue generation: those deposits get deployed as consumer credit for purchases. Merchants pay a 3% transaction fee to Klarna on each sale. This closed-loop model is brilliant because it monetizes both sides—savers get returns, merchants pay for the infrastructure, and consumers get instant credit. It's a direct challenge to the traditional credit card model, which relies on interchange fees and consumer interest. Klarna essentially reimagined consumer lending for the e-commerce era. The real test: can they scale this profitably while managing credit risk across millions of transactions?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityWhisperer
· 10h ago
Carnar's gameplay is indeed fierce; 13B in deposits is like real estate, and a 3% interest rate puts traditional banks to shame...
View OriginalReply0
LeekCutter
· 10h ago
The closed-loop model is indeed powerful, but can 13B in deposits withstand several bad debt cycles?
View OriginalReply0
Rugman_Walking
· 10h ago
Klarna's approach is basically about making money more liquid—taking deposits with the left hand, issuing loans with the right, and then profiting from merchant fees in the middle. Clever.
View OriginalReply0
Blockchainiac
· 10h ago
Carnar's gameplay is truly awesome; with just 13B in deposits, it's been revitalized like this—an art of middlemen earning the spread.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e51e87c7
· 10h ago
NGL, Klarna's strategy is really brilliant—using bank deposits as low-cost capital and then re-lending... Definitely a financial arbitrage. It's just that how long this risk management can hold up remains uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-7b078580
· 10h ago
Data shows that the bad debt rate is the key... 13B in deposits sounds impressive, but what does that 3% interest rate really mean? The 3% fee earned from financing costs at historic lows, although the closed-loop model is well-designed, how much will actual risk control costs eat up? Let's wait and see a few quarterly financial reports.
Klarna's playbook is deceptively simple but highly effective. The fintech company accumulated $13B in customer deposits by offering competitive interest rates around 3% at its Swedish banking arm. Smart move—it created a stable, low-cost funding source. Then comes the revenue generation: those deposits get deployed as consumer credit for purchases. Merchants pay a 3% transaction fee to Klarna on each sale. This closed-loop model is brilliant because it monetizes both sides—savers get returns, merchants pay for the infrastructure, and consumers get instant credit. It's a direct challenge to the traditional credit card model, which relies on interchange fees and consumer interest. Klarna essentially reimagined consumer lending for the e-commerce era. The real test: can they scale this profitably while managing credit risk across millions of transactions?