Adam Smith gets way too much credit as the 'father of economics.' Sure, he laid down some foundational ideas about market dynamics and the invisible hand, but here's the thing—plenty of economists before and after him contributed equally important pieces to how we understand markets today. His theories have limits too, especially when applied to modern financial systems and digital assets. Worth reconsidering how much weight we actually give to historical figures versus understanding current market mechanics. What's your take on how classical economics holds up in the crypto era?