2026-01-03 00:20:19

The most potentially noteworthy airdrop of 2026 is coming

Unit, this infrastructure protocol, does something quite special — it allows you to deposit any assets directly on the native chain, completely bypassing the hassle of third-party cross-chain bridges, and then use these assets directly in Hyperliquid spot trading. It sounds simple, but it’s a very hard requirement.

From a fundamental perspective, Unit has already locked in a total value of $500 million, with weekly fees stable at around $150,000. This growth curve and fee capacity indicate that the market truly believes in this logical framework. Cross-chain liquidity fragmentation has always been a pain point in the ecosystem, and Unit solves the last mile of asset realization in a more elegant way.

If the airdrop is designed to be aggressive enough, this opportunity could indeed be a major event in 2026.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RugDocDetective

· 5h ago

500 million locked tokens is indeed significant, but the real test is how hard the airdrop can hit.

View OriginalReply0

SybilSlayer

· 8h ago

500 million locked, weekly fee of 150,000. These numbers are indeed no exaggeration; cross-chain bridging has always been a pitfall. --- Wait, can Hyperliquid really be used seamlessly, or is it just another paper plan? --- Airdrops can be aggressive, but I'm afraid it's just another scheme to harvest retail investors. --- I understand Unit's logic, but claiming that 2026 is the most worth paying attention to? That's too absolute. --- Hard requirements are hard requirements, but how many people can truly benefit from airdrop dividends?

View OriginalReply0

fren.eth

· 8h ago

Nah, this time the airdrop design for Unit has to be really crazy, or it'll just be another round of cutting leeks. Unit indeed solves a real pain point, with 500 million TVL and stable fees—those numbers are no lie... but why does it feel like every time they say "this time it’s definitely different"? Cross-chain demand is real, but a simple infrastructure protocol airdrop often isn’t as impressive as expected. I think it’s better to experience it on-chain first. Brothers who got in early just need to get a decent share, I don’t have high expectations. So, how is the depth of Hyperliquid now? Is the liquidity stored in Unit really better than traditional bridging? Wait, isn’t this just a disguised liquidity aggregator? Why run a separate one?

View OriginalReply0

OffchainWinner

· 8h ago

Damn, a TVL of 500 million dollars, this data is indeed impressive. Finally, someone is seriously addressing the cross-chain bridging issue. Let's see how the airdrop is designed. Really? A weekly fee of 150,000 and still growing steadily? Is this protocol genuinely solving problems or just hype? Next year around this time, pay attention to Unit; it seems wise to get in early. But speaking of which, the success of such infrastructure airdrops always depends on how deeply people participate. Wait, has the liquidity issue on Hyperliquid been so easily resolved? If that's true, I need to try it out quickly so I don't miss the airdrop again. Sounds good, but let's wait until it launches to see actual performance. Infrastructure projects often have pitfalls. Aggressive airdrops + underlying demand + existing data, there's indeed something there.

View OriginalReply0

ZkSnarker

· 8h ago

honestly the "elegant solution" framing here is doing a lot of work... like yeah bridging sucks but does Unit *actually* solve fragmentation or just move the bottleneck around? would need to see the tokenomics before i'm convinced this is more than hype-driven tva capture play

Reply0

OnchainFortuneTeller

· 8h ago

I've fallen into too many pitfalls with cross-chain bridging, and Unit's move is truly brilliant... The logic of directly storing assets on the native chain is really appealing. --- With 500 million locked and a weekly fee of 150,000, stable output shows that someone is indeed buying in. I'm just worried that when the airdrop happens, it will be another scenario where retail investors are left holding the bag. --- The last mile is well explained, but the truth is that the real profit always comes from mining and early participants. We can only hope that the airdrop design isn't a joke. --- Aggressive airdrop designs are just for listening; be careful not to turn into another wave of "big pancakes"... But it's definitely worth trying to get on board. --- The Hyperliquid ecosystem is filling in its shortfalls again. The logical chain is solid, but the question is, when is the optimal timing? --- How hard is it to bypass third-party bridging? Real data speaks the loudest, and it all depends on how daily active users develop later.

View OriginalReply0