2026-01-03 19:25:22

Major developments in institutional crypto holdings: A leading asset manager transferred over $123M worth of Bitcoin and Ethereum to a compliant custody platform amid mounting pressure from year-end fund redemptions. The significant transfer underscores the institution's strategic reliance on professional custody solutions to manage and settle its Bitcoin treasury exceeding $67B. Such moves reflect ongoing institutional confidence in secure digital asset infrastructure during volatile market periods.

BTC-2.68%

ETH-4.15%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCrier

· 01-06 19:00

1.2.3 billion worth of Bitcoin moving around, this is their game. Are retail investors still struggling with whether to buy or not? Are the institutions just shifting blame with this move or are they genuinely optimistic? It's hard to tell... Big players are bottom fishing. The projects I believe in are about to take off, right? The redemption pressure at the end of the year is so high. What does it mean... money is flowing out. Assets worth over ten or twenty billion placed on custodial platforms. Is this safe or is there another agenda? Looking at this trend, the institutions are really not panicking. Should we panic? $1.23 billion being transferred—are they planning or are they cutting losses? Institutions are acting more and more frequently. What kind of groundwork are they laying?

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerProfit

· 01-05 11:11

123M moved to compliant custody and started boosting institutional confidence, alright🙃 --- Wait, 67B Bitcoin reserves? This number just doesn't look right --- End-of-year redemption pressure is so high, yet people are still holding coins, this is true faith --- Compliance custody platforms are about to earn another round of fees, clever --- Basically, even institutions are scared, they need to find a "safe house" to store their coins --- This move is definitely a "asset transfer" tactic before bottom-fishing --- institutional confidence... I think it’s more about institutional survival --- Moving 123M all at once, there must be some other big moves behind the scenes that haven't been exposed

View OriginalReply0

FlatlineTrader

· 01-05 08:08

This institution is really rock solid, moving 123 million USD in a snap to professional custody—are they brave or what?

View OriginalReply0

DegenTherapist

· 01-03 19:41

123M relocation, it seems that institutions also have to obediently use the mainstream players. The pressure is immense.

View OriginalReply0

ChainPoet

· 01-03 19:31

Transfer 123M in one go, is this guy really not afraid? Or is the withdrawal pressure at the end of the year just that heavy?

View OriginalReply0

SignatureLiquidator

· 01-03 19:29

Institutions are pouring money into custody, what does that indicate... The end-of-year redemption wave is coming, right?

View OriginalReply0

WagmiWarrior

· 01-03 19:28

1.2 billion USD transferred to the custody platform, this is the style of institutional players. Under year-end redemption pressure, they still need to protect their positions. 2. The Bitcoin inventory of 670 billion... to be honest, this scale is no longer small-scale, institutions are really making serious moves. 3. Even at the end of the year, they are still pouring money into compliant custody, indicating that these institutions have no plans to cut losses; they are just waiting for next year. 4. A transfer of over 100 million is just a small fraction compared to risk management, but this signal is strong enough. 5. Custody solutions will become highly sought after next year. It's not too late to start paying attention now. 6. When the market is volatile, institutions are actually increasing infrastructure investments. I understand this logic. 7. Still adjusting their portfolios in December, indicating internal disagreements are not small.

View OriginalReply0