A major investment bank was handed a mere $10 penalty for orchestrating a massive market manipulation scheme in precious metals trading worth $100 billion. The slap-on-the-wrist punishment sparked debate in the Web3 community about regulatory capture and institutional accountability—stark contrast to how harshly crypto projects face enforcement. This disparity raises questions about whether traditional finance operates under different rules.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
fren.ethvip
· 19h ago
Laughing out loud, a $10 fine? I'd rather pay a gas fee. I'm already tired of the double standards and rhetoric of traditional finance.
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalistvip
· 19h ago
Ten bucks? That's crazy... Our project can be fined to death for any compliance issue, while they manipulate billions and only get a petty fine. This is the reality.
View OriginalReply0
pvt_key_collectorvip
· 19h ago
A 10 yuan fine? That's hilarious. This is the game rule of traditional finance... We get exploited, and they just brush it off and move on.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleSurfervip
· 19h ago
That's how traditional finance is—$10 fine? Laughable. Any small exchange can be heavily penalized. Double standards are everywhere.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMotivatorvip
· 19h ago
Fuck, ten dollars? This is obviously insulting our intelligence.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)