On the edge of Western Australia's hematite ore region, another heavy freight train roars toward the port. My mining friend patted the red dirt on his shoulder and said with a wry smile, "All of these are shipped to the same place. We're not really mining; we're clearly delivering nutrients to a giant."



He pulled up data on his phone: iron ore, copper concentrate, spodumene... Behind each bulk commodity, the import share is between 60% and 90%. What shocked me at that moment wasn't these numbers, but what they revealed—the flow and pricing power of global physical resources are being restructured by an unprecedented scale effect.

Imagine when a buyer can systematically absorb 60%-90% of a certain type of mineral globally, the so-called "global market" actually becomes a targeted supply network organized around this demand point. This isn't just a capacity issue; it's an independent closed loop—resource extraction, processing and manufacturing, global export, all interconnected.

More importantly, the financial aspect of this closed loop. Such a scale of commodity flow requires enormous cross-border trade settlements, supply chain financing, and price hedging. But in the current system, these processes are hampered by centralized intermediaries, high costs, and geopolitical risks. The flow of physical goods has become so concentrated and efficient; why does the flow of funds and credit still stick to old routines? This contradiction will inevitably be broken by someone sooner or later.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-9ad11037vip
· 7h ago
Basically, the system is just too mismatched. Commodity circulation is already so efficient, but the financial side is still using outdated systems. This gap will have to be bridged sooner or later, or else efficiency will always be wasted.
View OriginalReply0
rugdoc.ethvip
· 18h ago
Haha, that's why I've always been optimistic about on-chain settlement. The physical goods flow is so concentrated, while the financial layer is still relying on old methods. It will be reconstructed sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
DogeBachelorvip
· 18h ago
60%-90% import share? Once this number comes out, you’ll know who the big boss is, haha. Physical goods are moving so efficiently, yet financial settlements are still using outdated methods, which is indeed ridiculous. Is it time for blockchain to handle cross-border settlements?
View OriginalReply0
SeeYouInFourYearsvip
· 18h ago
That's why we need on-chain settlement. The inefficiencies in the financial layer will eventually be restructured.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoChainvip
· 18h ago
60%-90% import share? Damn, this data is pretty brutal... Basically, the pricing power has been completely taken away. Capital flow is still stuck in the old routines, and this is definitely a pain point...
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)