2026-01-04 20:22:19

An interesting debate has started in international relations: Are power-based decision-making mechanisms truly sustainable?

According to one source, "The use of force must be regulated by rules. Otherwise, the world becomes subject to the law of the strongest." This view actually parallels the fundamental principle of the crypto and blockchain ecosystem.

The same issue encountered in the Web3 world is: centralization of power in centralized systems, the lack of a regulated framework. Blockchain, on the other hand, advocates the exact opposite — transparency, distributed decision-making mechanisms, and rules.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ShamedApeSeller

· 17h ago

Basically, it's about checks and balances. The traditional system finally needs to reflect.

View OriginalReply0

InfraVibes

· 17h ago

Really, unchecked power leads to disaster. In this regard, traditional international order and crypto are actually on the same side.

View OriginalReply0

ProofOfNothing

· 17h ago

To be honest, unchecked power is the end of the world... Blockchain technology is actually designed to fundamentally solve this problem, but in reality? Large investors still harvest profits like cutting leeks, isn't that just another form of centralization?

View OriginalReply0

NFTRegretDiary

· 17h ago

Hmm... Isn't this about checks and balances? The Web3 decentralization logic sounds great in theory, but in reality, aren't there still many cases of big players cutting the leeks?

View OriginalReply0