2026-01-04 20:25:13

Warden's true goal is not to create more skilled traders, but to reshape the cognitive logic of the market.

It abandons the traditional technical analysis templates. Instead, it focuses on understanding background information—events themselves, why they happen, and how these factors drive price changes. You don't need to memorize candlestick patterns by heart, but learn to track causal relationships and connect macro factors with micro price movements. This shift in thinking is the key to truly improving trading success rates.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

YieldHunter

· 17h ago

nah tbh this just sounds like "understand fundamentals" with extra steps... if you look at the data, most traders still lose money regardless of their framework lol

Reply0

DegenWhisperer

· 17h ago

In simple terms, it means abandoning the fixed templates of technical analysis and shifting to a causal logical chain of thinking. This approach is indeed innovative.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropAutomaton

· 17h ago

Basically, it's about not wanting us to be fooled by the candlestick charts anymore; we need to learn to understand the underlying logic.

View OriginalReply0

EntryPositionAnalyst

· 17h ago

Hey, someone finally said it—the whole technical analysis approach is indeed outdated.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedTwice

· 17h ago

Well said, finally someone hit the nail on the head. I was previously fooled by the K-line methods, and only now do I understand that causal logic is the true way.

View OriginalReply0

RamenDeFiSurvivor

· 17h ago

Well said, finally someone hit the key point. Tired of those line drawing manipulations, you really need to understand the market from the perspective of the causal chain.

View OriginalReply0