Seeing headlines like "Bitcoin will help pay off the US$38.5 trillion debt"—doesn't that make you want to click and see more? Honestly, most people are attracted by this kind of statement, but in reality, they only see the surface-level "sharp rise" expectation and haven't really understood the underlying logic.
Let's clarify the fundamentals first. The US national debt has already surpassed US$38.5 trillion. What does this mean? It's equivalent to the entire annual GDP of the third-largest economy in the world. Due to such enormous debt pressure, the market has started to spin stories—Bitcoin's market cap surging to US$8.5 trillion, directly becoming a main force for debt repayment. It sounds great, but where's the problem?
The core logical flaw is liquidity. Currently, the total market liquidity of Bitcoin is only in the hundreds of billions of dollars. Even if its market cap truly reaches US$8.5 trillion, the US government would want to use it to pay off debt. Once they start large-scale cashing out, the market would collapse immediately. This operation is like jumping into the sea with a bunch of gold bars—appears to have assets, but in reality, they are useless. So, the US is unlikely to really pin its hopes on this.
Having observed this circle for 8 years, I want to share a more reliable perspective with you. The value of Bitcoin is not fundamentally about "who uses it to pay off debt." Its true driving force comes from another direction—in the context of escalating global debt crises, its status as a safe-haven asset is being re-priced.
Recently, a phenomenon worth noting is that those Wall Street institutions that once looked at cryptocurrencies with indifference are starting to quietly position themselves. Why have they changed their minds? Not because they believe Bitcoin can save US debt, but because the credibility of the dollar continues to weaken. When the appeal of traditional safe-haven assets declines, allocating assets like Bitcoin as an alternative becomes a hedging choice. This is the real reflection of the changing market landscape.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LayerZeroEnjoyer
· 16h ago
The point about liquidity is correct; that's why those headlines are all clickbait.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e87b21ee
· 16h ago
Wow, this title definitely got me hooked haha. But honestly, the part about liquidity is spot on... Once the US government really starts dumping, it’s a suicidal cash-out. The folks on Wall Street are now positioning themselves, basically betting on the dollar's devaluation. Smart move.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerProfit
· 16h ago
Haha, once again this "Bitcoin Savior" narrative, it's really getting tiresome.
Well said, the point about liquidity hits the mark, that's the real issue.
Wall Street's secret布局 is indeed interesting, but to be honest, it's still the dollar depreciating, they didn't choose BTC because they had no other options.
38.5 trillion... this number makes me a bit hopeless.
Instead of wondering who will save the debt, it's better to look at how to allocate your own assets.
Keep a close eye on the dollar's weakening, really.
The logic is sound, but don't overestimate these institutions' willingness to change; cutting leeks is always the top priority.
Eight years of observation is hardcore enough, but too many people believe these "stories."
It's really just a hedging game, not that mysterious.
View OriginalReply0
NewPumpamentals
· 16h ago
The storytelling technique is indeed top-notch, but liquidity is really a major weakness.
Seeing headlines like "Bitcoin will help pay off the US$38.5 trillion debt"—doesn't that make you want to click and see more? Honestly, most people are attracted by this kind of statement, but in reality, they only see the surface-level "sharp rise" expectation and haven't really understood the underlying logic.
Let's clarify the fundamentals first. The US national debt has already surpassed US$38.5 trillion. What does this mean? It's equivalent to the entire annual GDP of the third-largest economy in the world. Due to such enormous debt pressure, the market has started to spin stories—Bitcoin's market cap surging to US$8.5 trillion, directly becoming a main force for debt repayment. It sounds great, but where's the problem?
The core logical flaw is liquidity. Currently, the total market liquidity of Bitcoin is only in the hundreds of billions of dollars. Even if its market cap truly reaches US$8.5 trillion, the US government would want to use it to pay off debt. Once they start large-scale cashing out, the market would collapse immediately. This operation is like jumping into the sea with a bunch of gold bars—appears to have assets, but in reality, they are useless. So, the US is unlikely to really pin its hopes on this.
Having observed this circle for 8 years, I want to share a more reliable perspective with you. The value of Bitcoin is not fundamentally about "who uses it to pay off debt." Its true driving force comes from another direction—in the context of escalating global debt crises, its status as a safe-haven asset is being re-priced.
Recently, a phenomenon worth noting is that those Wall Street institutions that once looked at cryptocurrencies with indifference are starting to quietly position themselves. Why have they changed their minds? Not because they believe Bitcoin can save US debt, but because the credibility of the dollar continues to weaken. When the appeal of traditional safe-haven assets declines, allocating assets like Bitcoin as an alternative becomes a hedging choice. This is the real reflection of the changing market landscape.