Most payment solutions are arguing over speed and cost, but they overlook a more fundamental issue. Why does capital flow still remain in the era before the internet?
The reality is quite harsh: merchants have to wait several days to receive funds, banks squeeze fees in the middle, and liquidity gets stuck on the way. This gap has never been seriously addressed.
Tria saw this opportunity. They are not just optimizing the old system again, but building a new infrastructure for capital flow from scratch. Making money flow as quickly as information—that is the true change. Projects with this mindset are worth paying attention to because they address the core efficiency problem of payment networks.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GhostAddressMiner
· 15h ago
That's correct, but I want to see more about Tria's fund flow... What are those early addresses doing now?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityLarry
· 15h ago
Money flowing like information? That's a good idea, but can it really eliminate the middlemen at banks? I'm skeptical.
---
Another project claiming to be revolutionary, but the key is whether it can truly be implemented.
---
Waiting several days for the funds to arrive is indeed outrageous, but I haven't figured out how Tria's plan will be practically executed.
---
Capital flow being stuck in the old era is true, but the question is who dares to challenge the banks' dominance?
---
Building from scratch sounds sexy, but how to handle compatibility and risk control? Who dares to use it?
---
I'm so annoyed with payment solutions. They boast about speed and low cost every day, but in the end, you still have to queue. Can Tria really change the game rules?
---
It sounds good, but at the core, it's still a liquidity issue. Speed alone isn't enough.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyHashValue
· 15h ago
Wait a minute, the issue of merchants receiving funds T+ how many days later really deserves to be criticized to death.
To be honest, the banking system is just bloodsucking. All the so-called payment innovations are actually struggling within the old framework.
I support the Tria approach. The real thing is to fundamentally transform liquidity.
If money could really move as fast as information... that would be revolutionary. Right now, these superficial optimizations are just scams.
Most payment solutions are arguing over speed and cost, but they overlook a more fundamental issue. Why does capital flow still remain in the era before the internet?
The reality is quite harsh: merchants have to wait several days to receive funds, banks squeeze fees in the middle, and liquidity gets stuck on the way. This gap has never been seriously addressed.
Tria saw this opportunity. They are not just optimizing the old system again, but building a new infrastructure for capital flow from scratch. Making money flow as quickly as information—that is the true change. Projects with this mindset are worth paying attention to because they address the core efficiency problem of payment networks.