A well-known investor's total US stock holdings by Q3 2025 are approximately $14.679 billion, with the top ten holdings accounting for 99.51%—this level of concentration is more extreme than many people imagine.
The most exaggerated in the portfolio is Apple(AAPL), accounting for 60.42%, making it a solid cornerstone and also the biggest profit contributor. Closely following is Berkshire(BRK.B), with the holding ratio suddenly jumping to 17.78%, a 53.53% increase—market turbulence is seeking certainty, and this adjustment in allocation speaks volumes.
The counterexamples are also quite interesting. Alibaba(BABA) and Nvidia(NVDA) both reduced their holdings by over 25%, but Pinduoduo(PDD) remained unchanged, and even a new position was added in ASML(ASML). What does this indicate? When US stocks reached high levels, he was not greedy, preferring to miss some quick profits to ensure a solid asset structure.
This logic is actually very clear: buying stocks is buying companies, not relying on frequent trading to prove how smart you are, but earning money that you can understand. From recent portfolio adjustments, this investor’s restraint and calmness are truly worth pondering—earning less quick money in exchange for overall stability, especially during market frenzy, is particularly rare.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugDocDetective
· 14h ago
60% Apple really dares to do that, how much do they believe in it or is there really nothing more trustworthy than Apple? By the way, this extreme configuration looks a bit scary.
View OriginalReply0
RektDetective
· 14h ago
Apple 60%? This guy is really betting big, either winning big or losing everything, no middle ground.
I can understand reducing NVDA holdings, but I didn't expect it to be so harsh. It seems the chip hype has gotten a bit out of control.
This is the kind of investor attitude—not following the crowd, only eating the meat they understand, much more comfortable than those who frequently trade and are called "smart people."
Berkshire's 17% increase and 53% rise are indeed signals that the market is seeking reassurance.
Pinduoduo remaining steady is quite interesting, indicating a very solid holding logic.
Having 14.6 billion and still being so restrained is indeed rare. Most wealthy people have already started to invest recklessly.
Concentration ratio of 99%, this risk awareness is really lacking, but it seems they haven't lost money either.
View OriginalReply0
PseudoIntellectual
· 14h ago
60% is on Apple, this guts is really incredible. If it were me, I would have already lost sleep, but they just keep making money...
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLab
· 14h ago
Apple's 60% configuration... This guy has taken the egg basket theory to the extreme. Theoretically, it should be feasible, but I find it a bit unsettling. But on the other hand, Pinduoduo remaining unmoved is indeed interesting; this is a very big game being played.
A well-known investor's total US stock holdings by Q3 2025 are approximately $14.679 billion, with the top ten holdings accounting for 99.51%—this level of concentration is more extreme than many people imagine.
The most exaggerated in the portfolio is Apple(AAPL), accounting for 60.42%, making it a solid cornerstone and also the biggest profit contributor. Closely following is Berkshire(BRK.B), with the holding ratio suddenly jumping to 17.78%, a 53.53% increase—market turbulence is seeking certainty, and this adjustment in allocation speaks volumes.
The counterexamples are also quite interesting. Alibaba(BABA) and Nvidia(NVDA) both reduced their holdings by over 25%, but Pinduoduo(PDD) remained unchanged, and even a new position was added in ASML(ASML). What does this indicate? When US stocks reached high levels, he was not greedy, preferring to miss some quick profits to ensure a solid asset structure.
This logic is actually very clear: buying stocks is buying companies, not relying on frequent trading to prove how smart you are, but earning money that you can understand. From recent portfolio adjustments, this investor’s restraint and calmness are truly worth pondering—earning less quick money in exchange for overall stability, especially during market frenzy, is particularly rare.