The story of liquidation is often not caused by a single bad decision, but by multiple misjudgments accumulating into a disaster. Those accounts that eventually go to zero usually go through this process: the first loss of 5% is acceptable; the second loss of 8% starts to make you nervous; then a third loss of 10%... Under continuous hits, the principal is gradually exhausted.



One effective way to avoid this spiral decline is to strictly enforce the principle of "not exceeding 3% of the total position in a single loss." It sounds simple, but in practice, it is extremely powerful.

For example, with a $10,000 account. If you allocate $2,000 per trade (which is a standard 20% position size), and use 10x leverage on mainstream cryptocurrencies like BTC or ETH, then a 1.5% stop-loss corresponds exactly to a $300 loss—just 3% of the total funds. Once the stop-loss is triggered, exit immediately, and that’s it.

What is the actual effect? Suppose you fail three consecutive judgments, with a total loss of only 9%. You still have $9,100 of principal. This amount is enough to help you calm down, analyze the next market cycle, and wait for real profit opportunities. In contrast, traders without loss limits might lose 10%, 20% in a single mistake, and quickly run out of funds.

The essence of stop-loss is actually "controlling damage." In the crypto market, learning how to lose is actually more important than learning how to make money. The most practical way to implement stop-loss is to keep each loss within a controllable range. This is not conservatism; it is survival wisdom.
BTC1.55%
ETH0.31%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-75ee51e7vip
· 14h ago
Well said, the 3% rule is truly a lifesaver. If I had known earlier, I wouldn't have been blown up so many times.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseFOMOguyvip
· 14h ago
To be honest, I've been using the 3% stop-loss strategy for a long time, but it's just too easy to break my mindset due to FOMO... When I see the market rebound, I want to chase, but often that chase leads to a direct explosion.
View OriginalReply0
RadioShackKnightvip
· 14h ago
That's right. I used to be that kind of idiot who would lose three times in a row, always thinking the next trade would turn things around, only to see a straight dive. Now that I've set a strict 3% stop-loss, I feel much less psychological pressure. At least I can stay alive to see the next market cycle.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAOvip
· 14h ago
That's true, but very few people can actually execute this plan. Most people are just holding on after losing 5%, hoping to turn it around, but end up going bankrupt in the end.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyMinervip
· 14h ago
Exactly right, it's all about refusing to cut losses. I've seen too many people hold on to their positions until they blow up, only to end up with nothing.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)