2026-01-07 00:50:32

#以太坊大户持仓变化 The Foundation's recent moves are quite interesting — on January 6th, they collectively voted to burn 48,053 tokens worth $57,663. Let's take a look at the overall ledger: with a total issuance of 1 million, over 520,000 have been burned, reducing the circulating supply to below 480,000.

The latest actions are even more noteworthy. Each Foundation member repurchased 500 tokens and deposited them into their wallets, effectively adding real funds after the burn. Additionally, individual holdings increased from 1,000 to 1,500 tokens, and they implemented a soft lock-up.

This combination seems aimed at strengthening the asset structure — reducing supply through burning on one hand, and demonstrating long-term confidence through increased holdings on the other. From a market perspective, such upper-layer actions often provide some guidance to the community. Is anyone following the subsequent developments in this area?

ETH-1.63%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BearMarketBard

· 01-07 08:48

Burning 520,000 sounds impressive, but the real signal is in increasing holdings—that's a tangible and substantial move.

View OriginalReply0

4am_degen

· 01-07 01:19

Wow, the Foundation's approach is really clever—one hand destroys, one hand increases holdings. What are they playing at? Huh? Soft locking? The signal still seems to be there. But can it really drive the market up? It depends on the follow-up actions. Is it really reliable if the Foundation buys in? I remain skeptical. Another trick to cut the leeks, huh? Why am I so distrustful? 520,000 destroyed, leaving 480,000 in circulation. This number is quite interesting. Wait, each member adds 500? What kind of signal is this sending?

View OriginalReply0

GhostInTheChain

· 01-07 01:18

Destroying 520,000 is quite aggressive; the circulating supply has almost been halved... The foundation is still buying, do they really believe in this or is it just for show?

View OriginalReply0

New_Ser_Ngmi

· 01-07 01:18

Destroying and increasing holdings, this tactic really has some tricks up its sleeve When will the dump happen It feels a bit like an unbreakable trap Real gold and silver piled up, are you saying you believe? But it feels a bit like hindsight bias, why didn't you do this earlier

View OriginalReply0

NFTHoarder