Recently, while using AI tools, I had an insight that might be the most noteworthy underlying logical shift in this wave of AI development:



I started asking myself a question—what is the smallest unit of expression of information?

My initial thought was straightforward, believing that the answer lay within the tools themselves. More powerful features, cooler interfaces, smarter assistants—seemed like they could solve the problem. But after using them, I realized that this approach was off track.

The more I delve into AI, the more I discover a pattern: all seemingly complex things ultimately revolve around the concept of structure.

Those visually flashy designs, stacked feature templates, automated workflows, and intricate knowledge systems—at first glance, they can be impressive, but the core competitive advantage isn’t there. What truly matters is how information is organized, how logic is connected, and how data is mapped.

This is somewhat similar to the discussion in blockchain—no matter how many application-layer wrappers there are, the design of the underlying protocol is the decisive factor. The same principle applies to information processing.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ser_ngmivip
· 3h ago
Well said, flashy UI can indeed be too confusing; true competitiveness still lies in the underlying logic.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Vaccinatedvip
· 01-07 09:51
Basically, it's about returning to the essence. No matter how fancy the UI is, it can't save poor logic. --- Structure > Function, I have deep experience with this. --- So ultimately, it still depends on the design at the protocol layer? Indeed, having more applications is pointless. --- Competing on features and interfaces is not as good as carefully considering how to organize information; that's the real differentiation. --- Damn, someone finally gets to the core of this issue. --- Reinventing the wheel again; the importance of data structures has been proven repeatedly over the years. --- This set of theories also applies to Web3. If the underlying protocol is weak, the ecosystem is doomed to not go far. --- Only after using it do you realize that piling on features is superficial; the logic layer is the core. It's a bit late now. --- The analogy is very apt; the blockchain stuff can indeed be explained clearly when applied.
View OriginalReply0
down_only_larryvip
· 01-07 09:50
To be honest, I've seen this logic on the chain a long time ago. The underlying layer is like a foundation; no matter how much money you spend on decoration, it's useless. But most people are still being fooled by the UI, haha.
View OriginalReply0
PerennialLeekvip
· 01-07 09:50
Basically, the underlying architecture determines everything. No matter how fancy the features are, they can't save a poorly designed system.
View OriginalReply0
not_your_keysvip
· 01-07 09:24
Ultimately, it still depends on the underlying architecture. Flashy UI cannot hide structural flaws at all.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)