A major event that many people overlooked yesterday — a large American bank with an asset size of $1.7 trillion officially announced the launch of a new policy. This is not hearsay, but another significant shift in the traditional financial system's attitude towards cryptocurrencies.



From passive to proactive, the change may seem subtle but is actually profound. Previously, financial advisors could only assist clients in purchasing Bitcoin when explicitly requested. Now, it’s different — 15,000 advisors across the US have received official approval to proactively recommend Bitcoin allocations in investment portfolios. This may sound simple, but behind it represents a reversal of the entire system’s power structure.

What is the official recommendation? For investors with higher risk tolerance, allocating 1%-4% of their portfolio to Bitcoin is considered a reasonable range. This number seems small, but when multiplied by all potential high-net-worth clients and their assets, the scale is terrifying.

In terms of specific operations, currently, only four regulated spot Bitcoin ETF products are available, such as BlackRock’s IBIT and Fidelity’s FBTC. This new policy covers the bank’s three major platforms: Merrill, Private Banking, and its online trading platform.

Why is this so important to the market? Because what truly stands between many traditional high-net-worth individuals and Bitcoin is not money — they are not short of money. The barrier is trust. In their eyes, investments must be formal, backed by major institutions, and executable through trusted financial advisors. Now, that barrier has been broken down. When financial advisors hold official research reports and tell clients to allocate Bitcoin, the nature of the situation changes completely.
BTC-0.99%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BridgeNomadvip
· 01-07 09:52
yeah but here's the thing nobody's talking about—who's actually auditing those 4 ETF products under the hood? trust assumptions are everything and we've seen this movie before with liquidity fragmentation on centralized solutions...
Reply0
GasFeeSobbervip
· 01-07 09:50
Wow, this is really different now. Traditional finance has finally lowered its guard. 1-4% allocation may not sound like much, but behind it are the voices of 15,000 advisors—it's real money. Once the trust barrier is broken, can you imagine how terrifying the FOMO among high-net-worth individuals will be?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntressvip
· 01-07 09:43
1%-4% allocation? The data shows this guy is quite sharp; the real incremental gains are in the hands of those 15,000 advisors. --- Once the trust threshold is broken, it all depends on how the ETF product's tokenomics is designed. Is it guaranteed to be trouble-free with BlackRock's backing? Historical data suggests we need to take another look. --- Wait, is this really institutional entry or just another prelude to a capital game? We need to keep an eye on the movements of those large wallet addresses. --- $17 trillion in institutional demand for BTC—if this materializes, the market landscape will change dramatically. --- It's worth considering, but don't be greedy. Once financial advisors start actively promoting, the risk premium may need to be reassessed. --- The key is when this policy will actually be implemented. Don't let it be another "planned" thing; the project's background needs to be thoroughly investigated again.
View OriginalReply0
ContractExplorervip
· 01-07 09:33
Wow, this is the real breakthrough. The trust barrier has been broken down, and next comes a flood of capital inflows.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)