2026-01-07 09:30:36

Recently, the actions of a well-known project team have sparked heated discussions in the community. First, they posted about public chain donations and then deleted the message, later changing their statement to say that they had used a custodial wallet before, and they also announced a new wallet address. This series of actions has left many community members confused.

What is even more noteworthy is that the project's token $RALPHA experienced a significant drop, with the decline exceeding expectations. Some community members pointed out that the project initially targeted airdrop distribution via Twitter channels, and theoretically, the recipients should be able to support wallet address changes. This flexibility in the mechanism design could directly impact the interests of token holders.

Transparency and consistency of information are crucial for the project's credibility, especially when it comes to sensitive issues involving funds and airdrop distribution.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidationWatcher

· 01-07 10:00

ngl this screams red flag city... delete then pivot on wallet story? that's not transparency that's damage control $RALPHA dumping hard and honestly? can't blame holders for sweating... been there, lost that

Reply0

DaisyUnicorn

· 01-07 10:00

Deleting posts and changing wallets—this combination is really watering down trust. $RALPHA keeps falling, even the flowers are wilting. --- It's that classic "post first, delete later" fiasco again. Is the custody wallet an excuse or the real situation? The community is watching closely. --- The airdrop mechanism doesn't support address switching? That's digging a hole for yourself, and ultimately the token holders will take the blame. --- As for transparency, the project team really needs to take a good lesson. Hiding things only makes it more awkward. --- I just want to ask, did someone break the window paper before the change of tone? It feels like this isn't that simple. --- The big drop in the token price is due to these messy operations. I've had similar experience with pitfalls before, and this time $RALPHA is a living lesson.

View OriginalReply0

GweiObserver

· 01-07 09:57

First delete, then modify; modify again and again, this operation is truly brilliant... --- This set of $RALPHA$ combo punches has left me a bit confused, really. --- Where is the promised transparency? Deleting messages and changing statements—I've seen this routine too many times. --- Changing wallet addresses at will? Then who will bear the risk of airdrops? --- The project team's recent actions are indeed a bit outrageous; no wonder the coin price has fallen so much. --- The information doesn't match up at all, and we're still talking about credibility—laughable. --- Deleting messages and changing wallets again—what are they playing at? --- Holders are really miserable; if the mechanism isn't flexible, that's one thing, but they keep stirring up trouble every day. --- Escrow wallets, new addresses... honestly, I don't understand what the project team is doing. --- Transparency seems to be a luxury for some projects.

View OriginalReply0

BrokenYield

· 01-07 09:54

ngl this is textbook liquidity crisis behavior... delete, pivot, new wallet? that's not transparency, that's correlation matrix red flags 🚩 $RALPHA dumping exactly as predicted when smart money smells protocol vulnerabilities. airdrop mechanism design this sloppy always ends the same way

Reply0

tx_or_didn't_happen

· 01-07 09:38

Deleted and changed the address again... Is this called transparency? Laughable, why hasn't $RALPHA reset to zero yet? --- It's the same story about wallet custody again, trusting you is the real joke. --- Blaming users for not clarifying the airdrop mechanism? The project team really knows how to pass the buck. --- The recent drop of $RALPHA is entirely deserved; who would believe in all this wordplay? --- They really treat us like fools, sending a message to delete and repost, then expecting us to keep following the chaos. --- Transparency? Why not be transparent about where the money actually went? --- It's always "it was a custodial wallet before," next time they'll probably change their story again.

View OriginalReply0