The original intention behind Sixr legends was not to create a short-term marketing gimmick. The project team deliberately abandoned the traditional approach—posting a few updates, airdropping an NFT, and then going silent.



The true idea is to encourage players to participate long-term within the game and the entire ecosystem. This difference in commitment is very crucial. Many fans are also drawn by this aspect. Rather than being just a marketing campaign, it’s about building a genuinely existing game world where players gain real and lasting value, not just a one-time hype. This is also why more and more Web3 game projects are beginning to reevaluate the sustainability of their ecosystems.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BTCRetirementFundvip
· 01-11 08:38
Someone finally said it clearly. It's much more reliable than projects that disappear after airdrops.
View OriginalReply0
BTCWaveRidervip
· 01-09 15:28
Honestly, this is the real way to play the game, not those tricks of cutting leeks and airdrops. Long-termism is indeed rare; most projects are still playing the harvesting game. Finally, someone understands that ecological sustainability is the true way. But it still depends on how the actual implementation goes; it's easy to talk about it. This approach is correct; building a genuine game world is better than anything else. After playing so many garbage Web3 projects, encountering something like this is truly worth cherishing. Long-term value vs. one-time hype, the difference is worlds apart. I understand the principles, but it all depends on how long Sixr can坚持.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinHuntervip
· 01-08 16:02
It sounds great, but I need to calm down... I heard this kind of pitch two years ago, and look what happened? The project team talks nicely, then runs away. It's not that I don't trust, but this industry has too many killers, so I need to look twice. If it can truly operate long-term, the token economic model must be solid; otherwise, inflation will turn it into trash sooner or later. How is this designed? Are there any details? Web3 game sustainability is a false proposition, right? There are no truly necessary application scenarios, and players ultimately just chase the token price. Don't fool me. Long-term participation sounds good, but I just want to ask: When can I cash out? Is there a lock-up period for cashing out? Be honest.
View OriginalReply0
WinterWarmthCatvip
· 01-08 15:52
This sounds good to hear, but I'm afraid it's just empty talk... It would be great if we can stick to it when it actually reaches the operational stage.
View OriginalReply0
ShamedApeSellervip
· 01-08 15:50
Finally, there is a project that dares to break away from the old way of cutting leeks. Sixr truly respects the players this time.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearchervip
· 01-08 15:46
How much of the promises in the white paper versus actual implementation are just hype? Are there any corresponding incentive mechanisms designed for governance proposals?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)