On a night in January 2025, a system administrator at a leading securities trading platform in Amsterdam routinely shut down the servers. Little did he know that over €300 million in trading records, equity certificates, and settlement instructions were waiting to be processed on the next business day. Meanwhile, on the other side of the Pacific, an Asian investor had just purchased European green bonds—during the next 72-hour settlement cycle, he could only pray that data would not be mishandled between cross-border banks, custodians, and clearinghouses.
This is the current state of traditional finance: a system still operating on 19th-century telegraph logic and 20th-century server architecture, moving trillions of capital daily, yet as fragile as a house of cards.
Until protocols like Dusk emerged, using code to rebuild financial infrastructure on-chain.
**Efficiency Black Hole: Why Is Cross-Border Settlement So Difficult?**
Have you ever bought overseas stocks through an international broker? Then you’ve experienced this "process": T+2 settlement (funds only arrive two days after the trade), international transfer fees often dozens of dollars, funds locked for several days, and numerous custodial and settlement fees. Retail investors find this troublesome, but for institutional investors, the problems are much greater.
An investment manager from a European family office once told us, "We want to allocate to Asian assets, but just the settlement cycle and foreign exchange costs can eat up a large part of the returns." So many quality trading opportunities are simply killed by inefficient financial infrastructure.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
YieldWhisperer
· 14h ago
€300 million in 72 hours, the experience of instant on-chain settlement with us really feels like two different worlds...
View OriginalReply0
MiningDisasterSurvivor
· 01-08 22:26
Another "Rebuilding Finance with Code"? I've been through this before. In 2018, when that bunch of Layer2 protocols were hyping up big promises, they said the same thing. And what happened? Some ran away, some had contract risks. What Dusk can solve, traditional finance should have solved long ago. The real issue is not technology; it's interests.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinja
· 01-08 16:04
300 million euros sleeping for one night, this efficiency is incredible, but we have to wait until Monday to move.
---
T+2 is really a nightmare; transferring funds still involves vampire fees draining a round.
---
That guy from the family office is right, I've seen too many cases where costs eat up the profits.
---
The House of Cards analogy is perfect; moving 19th-century telegraph logic to today is truly absurd.
---
If on-chain settlement can really get off the ground, it will be a game-changing advantage.
---
Locking funds for 72 hours to pray that the data doesn't go wrong? Haha, is this finance or gambling?
---
Every cross-border transfer feels like money laundering—fees are exorbitant and it's slow.
---
Projects like Dusk are essentially declaring war on the inefficiencies of traditional finance; code doesn't lie.
---
Retail investors have tried, but they really don't feel how big the problem is; it's the institutions where the blood flows freely.
View OriginalReply0
ponzi_poet
· 01-08 16:04
Really, 300 million euros just sleep for one night, traditional finance is this bad... Isn't on-chain settlement with instant transfer more appealing?
View OriginalReply0
NeverVoteOnDAO
· 01-08 16:03
The House of Cards metaphor is brilliant. Every day, we have to pray that the data doesn't go wrong. How absurd is that... Is on-chain reconstruction really the only way out?
View OriginalReply0
DeFi_Dad_Jokes
· 01-08 15:58
Praying for 72 hours without making a mistake? Haha, this is traditional finance. It's really just a house of cards design.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_trauma
· 01-08 15:52
300 million euros sleeping for one night, that must be so comfortable haha
View OriginalReply0
FortuneTeller42
· 01-08 15:52
The 72-hour settlement cycle is really outrageous. A colleague of mine had a cross-border transaction that was delayed until next week, by which time the market had already changed.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 01-08 15:46
72 hours of prayer without mistakes? Haha, this is the true value proposition of DeFi—on-chain settlement in 5 minutes.
On a night in January 2025, a system administrator at a leading securities trading platform in Amsterdam routinely shut down the servers. Little did he know that over €300 million in trading records, equity certificates, and settlement instructions were waiting to be processed on the next business day. Meanwhile, on the other side of the Pacific, an Asian investor had just purchased European green bonds—during the next 72-hour settlement cycle, he could only pray that data would not be mishandled between cross-border banks, custodians, and clearinghouses.
This is the current state of traditional finance: a system still operating on 19th-century telegraph logic and 20th-century server architecture, moving trillions of capital daily, yet as fragile as a house of cards.
Until protocols like Dusk emerged, using code to rebuild financial infrastructure on-chain.
**Efficiency Black Hole: Why Is Cross-Border Settlement So Difficult?**
Have you ever bought overseas stocks through an international broker? Then you’ve experienced this "process": T+2 settlement (funds only arrive two days after the trade), international transfer fees often dozens of dollars, funds locked for several days, and numerous custodial and settlement fees. Retail investors find this troublesome, but for institutional investors, the problems are much greater.
An investment manager from a European family office once told us, "We want to allocate to Asian assets, but just the settlement cycle and foreign exchange costs can eat up a large part of the returns." So many quality trading opportunities are simply killed by inefficient financial infrastructure.