Many people are unaware of a detail that causes both themselves and their friends to fall into traps — the issue of rebate binding.



Let's start with the current situation: a single ID card can usually only be bound once for rebate at a major exchange. Sounds fine? That's where the problem lies.

Some might think of cheating by unbinding and then binding a new account. But what happens? Neither party benefits —

After your friend cancels or unbinds, even if they re-register with the same ID, the system will recognize the identity as invalid. You still won't receive the commission, and they won't get the rebate. A wasted effort and a permanent loss of fee income. In plain terms, it's a double loss.

So, what is the correct approach?

First, only use IDs that have never been registered before. That's the foundation. Second, don't blindly pull in users; focus on attracting genuine new users. New users have the highest value and are more cost-effective. Most importantly, clearly communicate this rule so the other party understands. Only then can you build a professional trust relationship and establish long-term cooperation.

Honestly, information asymmetry exists, but don't exploit others' ignorance for a small short-term gain. Ruining someone else's long-term eligibility for a quick profit is harmful to both sides. Set clear rules before taking action — that’s responsible for both parties. That’s the smart way to do it.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Ser_This_Is_A_Casinovip
· 14h ago
Damn, I've stepped into this trap before, truly a painful lesson. This rule should have been widely known long ago; how many people are still messing around? A friend used the same ID twice, and I lost both of them... You're right, greed for small gains ultimately leads to nothing. Long-term stability is the way to go, brother.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvicevip
· 01-09 06:00
Wow, I stepped into this trap last year, and I really lost a lot... --- That's right, many people don't even realize this issue. I've seen several friends have disagreements because of it. --- So, harvesting profits should be done ethically, or it just becomes mutual harm. --- This rule needs to be clearly explained to people, or it will really be a double loss. --- Now I only invite genuine newcomers, it's much simpler. --- Information asymmetry is satisfying to use but very unethical; being transparent is better.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeJumpervip
· 01-08 16:57
Damn, I stepped into this trap, lost a lot, wasted so many ID resources.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyMinervip
· 01-08 16:51
Damn, this rule is really a trap, almost caused my friend to get caught. Honestly, if no one explains these details, you're doomed. There should have been a tutorial long ago. Brothers, make sure to clarify when recruiting people. Don't ruin someone's life just for a small commission. Few people understand this trick, so you need to share it to let more people know. I had a disagreement with a friend over this before, it was truly a double loss. Now I understand, I'd rather earn less than fall into such a trap.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHermitvip
· 01-08 16:51
Damn, this trap is really huge. My friend got caught in it like this... a permanent loss, brother.
View OriginalReply0
faded_wojak.ethvip
· 01-08 16:48
Wow, really? This pit is so deep... My friend was scammed like this before, and now the account is permanently disabled.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)