Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Why Bond Traders Stick With The ISM Index Over Digital PMI Readings
The shift in market focus is subtle but telling. While the PMI (Purchasing Managers' Index) has become the go-to metric for many analysts tracking manufacturing health, bond traders are increasingly leaning on the ISM (Institute for Supply Management) index as their preferred barometer.
Here's what's driving this preference: The ISM index, rooted in actual survey responses from supply chain professionals, captures sentiment that moves markets in real time. Bond prices don't lie—and traders pricing in yields are betting heavily on ISM data rather than the digitally-adjusted PMI variants.
The divergence matters more now than ever. As economic readings become harder to interpret in this transitional phase, traders are gravitating toward metrics with deeper institutional credibility and longer historical tracks. PMI models have been refined continuously, sometimes losing their grounding in raw market behavior. ISM, by contrast, maintains a direct line to manufacturing and services activity through straightforward survey methodology.
For anyone watching fixed income markets, this distinction isn't academic. It signals where smart money is actually hedging and what data points are truly moving the needle on duration and credit decisions.