Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin recently proposed a thought-provoking vision: Ethereum should become the "Linux" of the digital society. This analogy immediately caused a significant ripple across the entire crypto community.



From a visionary perspective, this idea is indeed grand. Vitalik pointed out that Linux's greatness lies in its open-source, free nature, yet it has become the cornerstone of global infrastructure. Ethereum's goal is similar—making the mainnet the most fundamental "trust root" in the digital society. Core functions involving autonomy such as finance, identity, and governance should all be built on Ethereum. The Ethereum Foundation's clear objective is to develop it into the value operating system of the internet.

But what about the reality? The situation is much more complex. There are 127 Layer-2 scaling chains in the backyard, engaged in fierce competition. In theory, L2 is a scalability solution, but in practice, it’s a not-so-garm war.

First, the race is overly crowded. On the surface, there are many options, but traffic and revenue are almost monopolized by a few leading L2s, showing a typical winner-takes-all pattern. Second, revenue collapse. Intense competition has caused most L2s to see a cliff-like decline in income, creating enormous survival pressure. Lastly, fragmented user experience. Each chain is like an isolated island, and cross-chain asset operations are quite complex, which actually worsens user experience.

This raises a deeper question: Are L2s truly helping Ethereum break through bottlenecks, or are they secretly splitting the ecosystem? When Vitalik talks about a unified trust foundation, the chaos among L2s might tear the ecosystem into disconnected fragments. Will this internal strife ultimately forge a more powerful, diverse system, or will it dismantle this grand vision from within?

The core issue Ethereum needs to address is: how to get these 127 chains to truly work together, rather than fighting each other and consuming resources. The answer may determine the future trajectory of the Ethereum ecosystem.
ETH0.42%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ApeWithNoChainvip
· 7h ago
127 L2s undercut each other, Vitalik's Linux dream seems a bit shaky --- Linux unified the infrastructure, but Ethereum is internally fighting... Is the script reversed? --- In a winner-takes-all game, most L2s will have to die. Honestly, that's how it is. --- With such poor cross-chain experience, who still expects ecosystem unification? First, clean up this mess. --- It seems Vitalik's ideals are lofty, but reality is a mess... 127 chains fighting separately can't create something big. --- If you ask me, sooner or later someone will unify these L2s, or they'll really become fragmented. --- With revenue collapse and experience breakdown, who will still play on small L2s? --- So is coordination the key? It feels like the cost of coordination is higher than just shutting down some chains.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSellervip
· 20h ago
127 L2s clustering together, it's really a big chaos stew --- Vitalik's vision is huge, but in reality, each L2 is fighting for the cake, who cares about trust roots --- Basically, it's still driven by interests, everyone wants to be the "next Arbitrum," but instead it accelerates internal ecosystem friction --- It feels like the Ethereum mainnet is being counterattacked by L2s; this isn't scalability, it's pure division --- Liquidity fragmentation is the real killer; cross-chain transactions can kill a project in one go --- The winner-takes-all approach is too brutal; what do the remaining L2s rely on to survive? --- I just want to ask, if this continues, is Ethereum's dream of being a "value operating system" going to cool off? --- People who previously all-in on a certain L2 must be feeling really uncomfortable now --- Actually, Linux succeeded because there weren't so many "competitors" causing trouble internally --- Internal ecosystem friction is more deadly than external enemies; why is this so hard to understand?
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 01-10 15:44
Each of the 127 L2s is fighting on its own. Where is the scalability? This is just a big internal chaos within the ecosystem. Vitalik's Linux dream has been shattered. Now it's just isolated islands, so troublesome. Where is the promised unified trust foundation? Instead, it's been torn apart by these L2 players. A winner-takes-all outcome. Other L2s have long lost their vitality. If this continues, how else can it be but fragmentation? Honestly, how much internal strife does Ethereum need to survive out of this pile of chains? Leading L2s monopolize traffic, and smaller L2s have already died. The landscape is completely rotten. It feels like Ethereum is self-destructing. Why do we have to create so many chains that keep undercutting each other?
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisfitvip
· 01-08 17:51
Each of the 127 chains plays its own game. Where is Linux? It’s just a scene of fragmentation and division. --- What about the unity of Linux? How did it turn into a fragmented competitive landscape? It feels like Vitalik’s vision is far from reality. --- The winner-takes-all approach ultimately harms ordinary users. Cross-chain operations are so complicated; who still has the mood to play? --- What sounds nice is a diverse ecosystem; what’s less nice is each fighting on its own... Can such a situation become infrastructure? --- 127 L2s are hotly competing, and the Ethereum mainnet is laughing. Isn’t this just a disguised split? --- The pressure to survive causes yields to collapse, and then these L2s might start pulling out all the stops to grab territory... Internal conflicts could become too tragic. --- Why do I feel that the original intention of L2 is slowly turning into a tool for "dividing the cake," and the true goal of scalability is becoming blurred?
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetectivevip
· 01-08 17:46
Basically, 127 L2s are acting like fools, Vitalik's Linux dream is probably shattered The winner-takes-all approach has long been tiresome, life on small chains is really tough If this continues, is it still called an ecosystem unity? I think it's just mutual bloodsucking The cross-chain experience really can scare off newbies, probably will have to wait a few more years To unify, first conquer these chains, the difficulty is comparable to the Linux community back in the day
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdropvip
· 01-08 17:41
127 chains each fighting on their own, isn't this self-splitting? Where's the promised Linux dream? --- Vitalik's pie-in-the-sky plans are impressive, but unfortunately, reality is a mess. --- L2s are fiercely competing, and the ones hurt are us workers. Cross-asset complexity is a thief. --- Hmm... Trust roots? Doubtful. If this continues, the risk of division is greater than imagined. --- Wait, do we really need 127 chains? Feels like a waste of resources. --- It sounds grand, but in practice, it's all pitfalls—typical of ideals that don't translate into reality. --- Who can't see the winner-takes-all situation? Small L2s should have packed up long ago. --- Good question, but what's the answer? I haven't seen it. --- The fragmented experience is real; I've been sickened by these isolated islands.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e87b21eevip
· 01-08 17:37
Each of the 127 chains is fighting on its own— isn't this exactly what a distributed system should look like... and does it really need to be unified? --- The analogy of Linux sounds great, but in reality, various distributions are fighting each other fiercely. --- In simple terms, multi-chain competition is splitting the cake too thin. The top players eat the meat, the bottom drink the soup. The "winner takes all" approach is outdated. --- V God’s pie-in-the-sky plans are impressive, but in terms of execution... well, internal conflicts are just part of the ecosystem. --- 127 Layer 2 solutions are not enough; keep competing, maybe in the end, a real solution will emerge? Anyway, right now, it’s a mess. --- The fact that each chain is an isolated island is too true— cross-chain costs are sky-high, and user experience is directly shattered. --- It feels like Ethereum is just a game of stacking height, building chains everywhere and competing everywhere. In the end, whoever survives will be the winner.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt