Storage issues have always been a pain point in DApp development. IPFS seems perfect, but in practice, it encounters real-world problems like content drift and slow retrieval speeds. Is there a way to make data smarter?



This is where programmable storage comes into play. When data is no longer just static files but objects that can be directly invoked and processed by smart contracts, the entire application architecture changes. This is not just an upgrade in storage but like giving Web3 applications a true brain.

From a technical perspective, the implementation of Walrus on the Sui blockchain is worth noting. Each data block stored in Walrus generates a corresponding credential object on the Sui chain, allowing developers to directly control permissions, transfer, or even destroy these data objects using the Move language. This design truly bridges the storage and execution layers.

Unlike permanently immutable Arweave, Walrus offers flexible lifecycle management capabilities. You can set data expiration based on business needs, enable automatic renewal through tokens, or trigger deletion based on logical conditions. This is especially useful for applications that handle large amounts of temporary cache—saving costs while maintaining data vitality.

In simple terms, this process transforms storage from a passive "hard drive" into an active "computing resource."
WAL11.89%
SUI2.45%
AR2.37%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NotGonnaMakeItvip
· 19h ago
IPFS is indeed disappointing, but Walrus's approach to programmable storage is quite good.
View OriginalReply0
DevChivevip
· 19h ago
I've long been tired of complaining about the issues with IPFS, but now Walrus has finally addressed the pain points. --- Programmable storage sounds impressive, but will it hold up in a production environment? --- Storage turning into computing resources? Sounds amazing, but I'm worried about hidden costs. --- Integrating execution layer is indeed innovative, better than the unchanging approach of Arweave. --- The token auto-renewal logic is interesting, but it might also mean extra gas fees. --- Using Move language to directly manipulate data objects can significantly improve the development experience. --- Flexible lifecycle control sounds good; I just want to know how atomicity is guaranteed during deletion confirmation. --- Implementing this on the Sui chain is a clever idea, a result of rapid ecosystem iteration. --- From passive hard drives to computing resources, that analogy might be a bit exaggerated. --- I really can't see how much cost can be saved with temporary caching.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractDivervip
· 19h ago
Wait a minute, Walrus's lifecycle management is smarter than Arweave's. Now DApps finally won't be doomed by permanent storage.
View OriginalReply0
degenwhisperervip
· 20h ago
Walrus's idea is indeed brilliant; programmable storage is truly a paradigm shift. --- The IPFS setup in production is just a joke... retrieval is painfully slow. --- Move language directly manipulates storage credentials? Now we've really connected on-chain and off-chain. --- Flexible lifecycle management > permanent immutability; Arweave's immutability can actually be a burden in certain scenarios. --- This is the true nature of Web3, not just a pile of concepts. --- Giving storage a brain—what a metaphor, I’m absolutely impressed. --- No wonder Walrus isn't taking off; it addresses real pain points.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)