Institutional capital doesn't move without trust. Security and compliance aren't just checkboxes—they're the foundation that separates real exchange volumes from speculation.



While most platforms cut corners, some players are taking a different approach. Pursuing formal regulatory registration, conducting comprehensive contract audits, and mapping out a transparent roadmap toward licensed digital asset derivatives trading. It's unglamorous work, but it's exactly what separates the contenders from the pretenders in this space.

This strategy signals serious intent. Building on proper regulatory foundations means tapping into institutional liquidity pools that won't touch unregistered platforms. The infrastructure might seem boring, but boring is what institutional investors pay for.

The platforms investing in compliance today are positioning themselves for the next cycle. When the wave of institutional adoption hits, they'll already have the keys to the kingdom.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-5854de8bvip
· 19h ago
Nah sounds good, but how many can really stick with it? Most end up compromising in the end...
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter_9000vip
· 19h ago
NGL compliance is really a long-term game... Those lazy platforms will eventually suffer losses.
View OriginalReply0
StopLossMastervip
· 19h ago
Nah, this is what forced justice looks like. Compliance should have been standard long ago, and there's no need to hype it up as a competitive advantage.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiChallengervip
· 19h ago
Ironically, every cycle someone says this, but what’s the result? Data shows that the liquidation rate of compliant projects in the last cycle was also quite high. I've heard this argument since 2017, and it’s still the same now. Interesting. The real reason institutions don’t enter the market is profit margins. Don’t pretend that compliance is a savior [cold laugh]. It’s just an excuse. Those with real liquidity never rely on the "mainstream" narrative to attract attention.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWizardvip
· 19h ago
Ha, compliance... It's true but overly idealistic. Do institutions really care that much? --- Boredom is real, but honestly, there's a big difference between having a license and not having one. --- Wait, those lazy platforms now can also make up for it later, and they'll get a share of the pie then. --- Boring is what institutional investors pay for... This sentence hits the point, the reality is so cruel. --- Overthinking it, the compliance cost for licenses is too high, small platforms simply can't afford to play.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)