Many people have a fundamental misunderstanding about the positioning of Dusk Network. When choosing a privacy public chain, you must first clarify: do you really need absolute anonymity, or auditable compliant privacy?

These two things are completely different. If your goal is to build a mixer pool like Tornado Cash, or to create dark web applications that completely evade regulation—then Dusk Network is not the solution at all. You will encounter obstacles at every turn within its architecture.

The reason is straightforward. Dusk uses two transaction models: Phoenix and Zedger. The "view key" mechanism introduced by Zedger essentially leaves an audit channel for regulators. Before users conduct restricted asset transactions, they must complete KYC off-chain and generate zero-knowledge proofs—Citadel protocol enforces strict gatekeeping here.

In other words: Dusk's privacy is not "disappearance," but "permissioned transparency." For applications that want to completely sever off-chain identity links and pursue anti-censorship, this design is a fatal conflict. Your fund flows must be auditable—that's the fundamental logic of the framework, and it cannot be changed.

So honestly, such requirements should be avoided from the start with Dusk Network. It specializes in its own domain; the gameplay you want simply isn't on its chessboard.