2026-01-11 01:20:14

#密码资产动态追踪 In the crypto world, politicians' attitudes can shift more dramatically than market fluctuations. Not long ago, Trump was touting "America will become the cryptocurrency capital," only to be followed by reports considering banning investor participation. This 180-degree turn truly caught people off guard. Thinking it over, from criticizing Bitcoin as "air-based" to aligning with the crypto industry during his campaign, these shifts are often backed by huge political donations.

Recently, such news has suddenly surfaced, and several possibilities exist — it could be a market bottoming signal, a prelude to larger policy changes, or simply pre-election public opinion manipulation. If a ban is actually implemented, the crypto market will definitely take a hit in the short term, but the current landscape has changed: traditional financial institutions are already involved, and globalized blockchain assets won't be easily suffocated by the policies of a single country.

The best approach to such information is not to panic or follow the crowd. Watch more, listen more, verify more — this is the most effective strategy. The market always rewards those who can keep their rhythm.

BTC-0.14%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Gm_Gn_Merchant

· 01-11 05:18

Politicians' mouths are even harder to see through than K-line charts. Some people really believe this stuff, and I just laugh. Once donations are in place, the stance shifts—this script is all too familiar. Ban? Come on, the institutions have already entered the market, what are we afraid of? People who don't follow the trend are the real winners, that's right. This move is a bit ruthless, I just want to see who gets cut. Hold on and don't panic and move randomly. Political pressure doesn't matter; the ecosystem has already been laid out. If they really want to ban, they can't do it—too naive. This 180-degree turn is truly outrageous; the smell of money is just too tempting.

View OriginalReply0

SatsStacking

· 01-11 01:50

What politicians say is worth a few Satoshis, we all know that in our hearts Another political drama, the buyer is always in the seller's story To put it plainly, whoever pays the money is the boss, I've seen this routine too many times Ban ban ban, every day ban ban ban, it should fall when it should fall, it should rise when it should rise Traditional finance has also entered, still afraid of his one-man show I just stick to dollar-cost averaging, let politicians say whatever they want Those who are truly making money are quietly accumulating, not just watching the news

View OriginalReply0

NFT_Therapy_Group

· 01-11 01:48

Politicians are like that; they change their tune when there's an interest, nothing surprising about it. Trump's move this time is truly hard to understand, but just don't get caught up in the hype. Donations are real money, worth much more than Twitter comments. Ban? Ha, the whole world is building chains; the US alone can't ban much. Instead of guessing, it's better to pay attention to institutional movements; where the money flows is the real answer. The market's textbook-like fluctuations—once you see through them, you make money; overcomplicating it only gets you trapped. Anyway, I’m holding steady; these small waves aren’t enough to shake me.

View OriginalReply0

DecentralizedElder

· 01-11 01:46

Trump's tactics are really slick; he can flip on a dime. But to be honest, bans are mostly just bluffing, used to scare retail investors. Honestly, the main players have already moved on, so we should stay calm. Politicians' words are just noise; let them go in one ear and out the other, don't take it seriously. This wave of news is probably just testing the institution's bottom line; don't let the FOMO cause you to get caught off guard. In the past ten years in the crypto world, haven't we seen enough policy rumors? Those who hold steady always make money, while the panicked ones always get cut.

View OriginalReply0

PensionDestroyer

· 01-11 01:40

Politicians flip faster than flipping a book, I've seen it many times. Once donations are in place, their attitude changes. Trump's recent move is really a bit hard to handle. But blowing up the ban issue is just talk; how likely is it to actually be implemented? It's just annoying when these kinds of news come out, they're all opportunities to cut leeks. Still, you have to hold steady; those panicking are just becoming bagholders. It's just a political game. The crypto world has already gone global; one country's policy change can't alter the overall trend. Pump and dump are routine operations. Once you see through this set, there's nothing to fear. Don't be led by public opinion; listen to the opposing voices before making a judgment. Actually, these are all tactics to trigger panic. True players won't be scared by such news at all.

View OriginalReply0

ruggedSoBadLMAO

· 01-11 01:40

Politicians flip faster than flipping a book. Let's just be honest and HODL. Coming with the same routine? Political donation players, don't be fooled by their words. Ban? Ha, globalized assets have long been prepared for this move. No worries. Short-term fluctuations are normal. Long-term holders have seen big scenes before. That's it. Only those who can hold on are the winners; others are just noise. Is this another attempt to test the waters? Politicians love playing psychological warfare. With such a large amount of capital, a single country can't do much. Instead, it's an opportunity. Don't follow the crowd blindly. Verification is the key. That's correct. Traditional finance has already entered. Still afraid of politicians' bluster? That's funny. I'm just waiting to see how they spin this 180-degree turn in the end.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-9279196d