2026-01-11 18:31:38

The liquidity of this football derivatives trading market is gradually taking shape. Based on current data, the platform can support a trading depth of up to $20,000, while keeping slippage within an acceptable range — which is a good performance for an emerging vertical market.

The most interesting aspect is its zero dealer fee spread design. This is not a traditional betting platform with a one-sided pricing model, but a peer-to-peer price discovery mechanism. Users are directly matched with each other, eliminating the profit margin spread of intermediaries — which means your trading counterpart is other participants, not the platform. The deeper the liquidity, the higher the market efficiency.

This P2P pricing remains attractive to long-term participants. They are not squeezed by dealer fees, and trading costs are transparent.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NFTArchaeologist

· 01-14 08:50

Zero fee spread sounds good, but is 20k liquidity really enough? Feels still too shallow. --- P2P pairing sounds sexy, but the problem is, there must be someone on the other side... Without that, everything else is just empty talk. --- Another "transparency"... The last time I heard this word was a week before a project team ran away haha. --- Football derivatives? Is that still missing in the crypto world? Might as well just bet on football directly. --- Long-term participants + no market maker fees = ideal situation. But when the market is cold, will slippage go crazy?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeWhisperer

· 01-12 10:42

Zero fee spreads sound great, but is the liquidity really deep enough? 20k is definitely not enough for large players to trade with.

View OriginalReply0

BagHolderTillRetire

· 01-11 18:56

Wait, P2P pairing sounds good, but is the liquidity really deep enough? $20,000 is still a bit thin for football derivatives.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatorFlash

· 01-11 18:56

$20,000 deep listening is comfortable, but I don't quite believe the term "acceptable" for slippage... I need to ask what the specific value is. This P2P pairing system... when liquidity is poor, it's actually easier to be swept, don't overestimate market efficiency.

View OriginalReply0

SurvivorshipBias

· 01-11 18:45

Zero fee spread sounds good, but the real question is whether the liquidity is deep enough. A $20k trading depth, to be honest, is still too shallow. --- P2P pairing sounds great, but what if there aren't enough counterparties? It still depends on the market makers behind the platform to support it. --- No dealer fees, slippage controlled, it feels like they’re just charging costs in a different way. Long-term players, wake up—there's no such thing as a free lunch. --- The design looks good, but the key is whether the user base is large enough. In markets with shallow liquidity, even transparent P2P is just a display. --- Zero fee spread? I'm more curious about how long the market-making depth can last. Emerging markets all have this kind of talk, but in the end, they often turn into ghost markets. --- Point-to-point price discovery mechanisms sound professional, but how is the actual trading experience? You only find out after experiencing the pitfalls.

View OriginalReply0