I've been following the Walrus new DeFi protocol recently, and honestly, some of its design ideas are quite interesting.



First, let's talk about liquidity. Walrus didn't follow the traditional route of integrating liquidity pools; instead, it achieves cross-chain liquidity dynamic allocation through smart contracts. What does this mean? When users participate in mining, they don't have to hop back and forth between different blockchains, saving on Gas fees and improving capital utilization. For those who operate frequently, the user experience difference is quite noticeable.

Next, let's look at yield distribution. Besides the standard sharing of transaction fees, $WAL holders can participate in ecosystem governance through staking, voting on protocol parameters. In other words, liquidity providers become governance participants, which is a more thorough implementation of the DeFi decentralization philosophy.

The most interesting part is its recent launch of an NFT+DeFi innovative segment—users can use NFTs as collateral to participate in liquidity mining. This not only gives NFTs a new use case but also introduces more diverse asset types into the DeFi ecosystem. Currently, the DeFi market is somewhat homogeneous, and Walrus's combination seems aimed at breaking this situation.

In the long term, $WAL still has growth potential in the cross-chain DeFi track. The upcoming ecosystem updates are worth paying attention to.
WAL1.46%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ZenChainWalkervip
· 8h ago
Cross-chain liquidity indeed has some real skills; saving gas is just too appealing for someone like me who operates frequently. --- NFT collateral mining? Sure, finally someone remembers that NFTs can be played this way. --- The logic behind governance participation is quite interesting, but I wonder if it will eventually turn into a game for big players. --- Breaking homogenization? Let me check first; I'm tired of hearing about new DeFi concepts over the past few years. --- There are many cross-chain solutions out there. Why can Walrus survive until the end? That’s the real question. --- Dynamic liquidity allocation... sounds grand, but whether it works smoothly in practice remains to be seen. --- Can I see the staking yield for $WAL? That’s the key point I care about. --- A combined approach is good, but I’m just worried that it might turn into another boring air project along the way.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHuntervip
· 8h ago
ngl the dynamic liquidity rebalancing is lowkey genius... but is anyone else scanning the mempool for sandwich opportunities on their cross-chain txs? 👀
Reply0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯vip
· 8h ago
Cross-chain liquidity dynamic allocation is indeed interesting. Saving gas fees is really helpful for someone like me who operates frequently. NFT collateral mining is a brilliant idea. Finally, someone realizes that these digital artworks can be used for more than just display. But I still want to see the actual performance later. The more hype there is, the more cautious I become.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)